Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has narrowed her search for a vice presidential running mate to two finalists, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, three sources with knowledge of the matter said on Monday.

Harris, the U.S. vice president, is expected to announce her selection by Tuesday, ahead of her first scheduled public appearance with her running mate in the evening at Temple University in Philadelphia.

103 points

Walz has Bernie’s seal of approval

That’s all I need to know

permalink
report
reply
35 points

indeed. Bernie remains a reasonably clean and reasonably clear assessor/signaler. he makes complex political decisions that much easier for voters.

going to miss the golden yardstick of his judgment when he finally bows out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Unfortunately we’ll probably never see the likes of him again

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

AOC is an excellent standard bearer for the Bernie style progressives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Warren is also excellent and we have a number of less popular policy wonk politicians around who are extremely driven on specific topics - Whitehouse, as an example, is excellent on climate change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The bern-index

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

My sole problem is Bernie as the Oprah of politics. He enabled quite a few people/trolls who were pretty toxic, the worst of the Bernie Bro/Chapo Trap House dirtbag movement, Briahna Joy Gray, and David Sirota off the top of my head.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How did he enable.the fuckwits at chapo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

What’s wrong with chapo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My friends in Minneapolis are pretty enamored with Walz. I don’t think they’d be thrilled to have to share him haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points

Bernie never won a national race.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

True but not because he wasn’t the best candidate

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

That obviously is a minority opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

Walz would be good, just please don’t pick Shapiro. Can we avoid shooting ourselves in the foot for once? We’ve got a good thing going with Kamala.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Do you think Shapiro would lock down PA? I like Walz more from what I know, but seems MN is in the bag regardless. Can’t see the strategy side of his pick other than Walz seems to be the progressive favorite, and checks the old white male box.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I don’t think he does lock down PA, his approval is solid but nothing crazy. And on top of that he has so many vulnerabilities. School vouchers and protest response, on top of old quotes being dredged out and the potential cover-up of sexual misconduct of one of his aides.

I would have looked at Kelly for his cheap points to score with low information voters (combat decorated Navy captain, astronaut), but Walz is also incredibly popular and has a good track record.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Walz is more likely to deliver Wisconsin and maybe Michigan, which are also valuable. (And like the other commenter, I also question the ability of a VP pick to reliably deliver their home state.) Wisconsin seems to really like Walz as much as we do here in Minnesota. And I think he does well in Pennsylvania, Walz has the vibes of an older and more mellow version (but not as old as he looks, school lunchroom duty will age anyone) of what we all thought Fetterman would be. Walz is from a small town, is a former national guardsman and high school football coach, and iirc used to enjoy hunting. He appeals to working class, blue collar voters in ways very few other Democrats can. He’s also involved with the national party (possibly the convention), someone on TikTok knew something was up with Biden just before he dropped out because Walz flew to DC to meet with Biden. The establishment Democrats like him and so do the progressives - he’s exactly who we need right now.

Also, he’s the reason we’re all calling Republicans ​weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

She going choose Shapiro because DNC tells her too and fucking hurt her campaign. Goddammit for once do the right thing here Shaprio is a horrible choice that fucking none of us want. Hence why they pick him. Dumb fucking Democrats hate them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

There are some impressively out of touch people making the calls in the democratic party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I don’t think “running mate from state X will lock down state X” deserves as much credence as political parties give it in general.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not based on historical data

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I don’t think Shapiro would lock PA. I think it’s pretty likely she could pick him and lose the state or not pick him and win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Nah, I highly doubt him being the VP pick could win the state alone. I think that Waltz is a better pick as a whole, including PA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

PA is already pretty firmly blue-purple. WI is more an uncertain purple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We definitely need any help we can get with PA. If PA goes blue that opens up a few avenues to the White House. Without it I think the only route is taking every single other swing state. Or maybe a surprise flip of a red state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Neither state is in the bag and no one can lock down PA. Shapiro and Walz are both white males. We are in a not very good timeline no matter what, so I’ll try not to worry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

It’s gotta be Walz. Shapiro would be a slap in the face to the Arab-American community, which we all very much need the support of if we want to prevent the fascists from winning the presidency.

permalink
report
reply
-14 points

At least let them believe Kamala would be firmer against Israel, even though we know she won’t be… Am I right? I prefer Walz too but picking Shapiro would be more honest to voters about what to expect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I wanted Kelly, but I’d be pretty happy with Walz. Shapiro would just take the wind out of the sails.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Harris closed out her search by interviewing three top candidates - Walz, Shapiro and U.S. Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona - at her Naval Observatory residence on Sunday, the sources said.

Kelly caused a stir on Sunday night when he posted on X “Now, my mission is serving Arizonans,” which was interpreted as a sign he was no longer in the running. He deleted the post and replaced it with “I’ve learned that when your country asks you to serve, you always answer the call.”

Sounds like nothing’s official yet about eliminating Kelly. I think he’d be the best choice as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I really like Kelly, too. I think there was just a lot of risk involved with pulling an incumbent Democratic Senator in a swing state that could potentially give an extra seat to the Republicans in an election year that’s already difficult for the Democrats on the Senate side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
3 points

And the more I read the more fired up I get. I have liked Walz for a while but just been spending more time reading deeper into his background, experience, and policy positions. Feels like he’ll really help drive the campaign and align to a lot of the wider progressive objectives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Walz to win; or Shapiro to lock up at AIPAC money.

Hmm.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 121K

    Comments