On X, political commentator Ed Krassenstein, a frequent Trump critic, commented on the change of opinion about polling numbers among the former president’s supporters.

“MAGA is breaking down. They are back to calling the polls fake just because they don’t reflect what they want them to say,” Krassenstein wrote. “It’s funny how they touted the polls when Trump was up.”

171 points

He’s preparing his base for another January 6th.

permalink
report
reply
77 points
*

Has been for 4 years now. It’s so frustrating to watch play out in front of our eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

When he picked JD Vance he thought for sure he was going to win and almost certainly would have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Nah, I hate this narrative. I’m sure he thought he would win, but I think it would have been pretty close with Biden ultimately prevailing. We’ll never know now. But saying Trump was a lock is ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Even when he wins, he still casts doubt on the system. Just look at his whining about Hillary in 2017.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Yup. For the last few months it’s been nothing but “Biden is old and loves open borders,” but when Kamala starts to pull ahead it’s, “be on the lookout for runaway fraud”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, we should have been revving up the fraud engine when Biden was decaying in front of our eyes on national television. Setting it up only after we switch to a young active candidate who gives people hope for a change seems kind of unnecessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

hopi g this time with an American in the white house anyone approaching the capitol will be met with 20mm cannonfire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Honest question, as a non-American.

Surely any and all secret services will be fully prepared this time, and if some MAGA nutjobs were to try it would result in an absolute massacre, right?

Would they be dumb enough to try? I know that you’re all armed to the teeth, but the US Army and Secret Service versus a bunch of cousin-fucking redneck bois is likely to end up in the former winning pretty handily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

See, you’d think. But unfortunately, as an old song once put it: some of those who work forces are the same who burn crosses

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think you’re right. The last one only kinda almost worked bc bloated mussolini was calling the shots behind deployment of security forces like the national guard. Next time meal team 6 won’t just be waltzing past an overwhelmed few capitol police.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Remember that fascists think of their enemy as being both weak and strong at the same time. This gives them a blind spot where they’re incapable of weighing their enemy’s true strength.

They’ll try, but they’re not as strong as they think they are. The number of Trump voters actually willing to get violent isn’t very big. Could get very bloody in a short period of time, but they’ll ultimately lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think the bigger issue this time is the potential for distributing the violence to smaller markets, so to speak - polling places, county clerk’s offices, secretaries of state, even state houses when they vote to certify their state results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He’s preparing his base for another January 6th.

Let’s bring stochastic terrorism back into the parlance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

That’s too sloppy. They’re gonna go for thing where it goes to, I forget if it was a house of reps vote or where each state gets a singular vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The electoral system? (Each state is supposed to get a number of votes based on their population)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If the election is contested, then there are “backup” protocols that are different than than the normal electoral college. I don’t recall if the “backup” protocol was a simple vote in the House of Representatives, or that each state gets a single vote. Trump kinda tried last time but didn’t have the support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No he’s not. They won’t need to storm the capitol because he will already have stolen the votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A lot harder to steal the votes when you’re not already sitting in the oval office

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

They’re never fake when he’s ahead, tho’.

Weird.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Weren’t they “fake” in 2016 and 2020 too? The man has such a limited vocabulary, no wonder he appeals to morons.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

It was widely reported at the time, but vocabulary analysis put him at about 8th grader level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s a surprisingly in-depth analysis, appreciated. Donnie’s brain has been rotting for almost seven additional years now, and the loud noises coming out of his face hole have only become less impressive. It’s safe to say he never made it out of middle school.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They might feel like they were right in 2016 given Trump ultimately did win the election (despite losing popular vote).

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The polls were correct in that Clinton won the popular vote. They were wrong on the electoral college outcome, but that came down to several states with razor thin margins being decided well under any margin of error for polls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

A lot of people believed they were wrong. They were pretty damn right, but humans suck at statistics. Hence the reason Vegas exists as a tourist destination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

that’s how you win an electrician. by faking poles

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Win an electrician? Are you talking about magnetic poles?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I’m positive that’s along the lines of their thinking. However, your guess is negative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I thought you just won electricians by being flirtatious on the job site.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How does one win an electrician and why would you want one? Their upkeep is very expensive, have you priced a new Fluke meter lately? And they tend to lose them regularly too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is the best aneurysm I’ve ever read

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Funny how the polls were “hugely precise” when they favored him.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

The melting mango is losing his shit. I don’t think his ticker can take the stress, especially considering it’s fueled mostly with hamberders. I’m calling it now-- if he loses the Nov election he’ll have a heart attack within 6 months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

My money is on a massive stroke and noone actually recognizes it because the new word salad is just like the old word salad

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

His face drooping wouldn’t be new either

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 175K

    Comments