Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign on Sunday is launching “Republicans for Harris” as she looks to win over Republican voters put off by Donald Trump’s candidacy.

The program will be a “campaign within a campaign,” according to Harris’ team, using well-known Republicans to activate their networks, with a particular emphasis on primary voters who backed former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley. The program will kick off with events this week in Arizona, North Carolina and Pennsylvania. Republicans backing Harris will also appear at rallies with the vice president and her soon-to-be-named running mate this coming week, the campaign said.

The Harris campaign shared the details of the program first with The Associated Press before the official announcement.

11 points
*

Please no, don’t pander to the right. Pick up the people farther to the left and invigorate younger voters. We’ve had enough centrists and doing this unravels where your momentum is actually coming from. But I guess you have to appease the doners…

permalink
report
reply
29 points

The strategy that will pick up those stray Republican votes isn’t going to moving to the right, it’s going to be focusing on the things that shouldn’t be partisan at all. Despite cosplaying as patriotic Americans, the MAGA crowd routinely positions itself in direct opposition to the core values and principles that America is supposed to stand for: liberty, equality, democracy, truth, justice, and the rule of law.

She doesn’t have to run to the right, she just has to run as someone that’s normal and point out how far from normal Trump and pals really are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not saying that the examples for your point don’t exist, but it feels like every time they do this it bites them in the ass super hard. These moves alienate people and are a great way to kill energy on the left. Unless we’re just saying that left-most voters don’t matter again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nothing I suggested should be a problem for the left. I specifically said that she wouldn’t win by moving to the right, but rather by running on things that shouldn’t be partisan, core principles which appeal across the political divide, but which aren’t shared by Trump or those around him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

we get energy on the left by the things they care about: thoughtful and prosocial policy. no contradiction there tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Unless we’re just saying that left-most voters don’t matter again.

Oh don’t worry, we (they) are saying that.

It wasn’t always this way for Harris, who, in 2020, faced off against Biden and more than a dozen other Democrats as the party lurched to the left.

“Running in a Democratic primary at the height of the racial reckoning in 2020, her background as a former prosecutor, I think, hurt her,” said Conway. “In 2024, the country is in the mood for a candidate that has her background and can go on offense against Donald Trump.”

First, Harris has to reintroduce herself and, in the process, reassure moderates, Republicans looking to her said. While Conway, Whitman and Shays all plan to vote for Harris, others may need more to come on board.

Whitman is clear-eyed about the challenge of putting at ease voters who may have reservations about Harris’s liberal record and stances. “It’s going to be tough,” Whitman said. “A lot’s going to depend on who she picks as vice president. Even though she’s not way-left, that’s how they’re going to paint her, and that’s how she’s going to be perceived.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Ffs!

I’m 41 and if I live to a hundred, the DNC will still think every election takes place in 1992 where there was tens of millions of votes in convincing moderate Republicans 🤦

“Almost but not quite in a fascist cult” is not a big or realistically persuadable demographic! 🤦

permalink
report
reply
26 points

There are people who are blissfully ignorant about politics without being the rabid cults that you see in the media. Maybe this can reach some of them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Nah, with how over saturated all news is with the latest scandals and political nonevents nowadays, the only ones blissfully ignorant purposefully avoid politics entirely

People so averse aren’t likely to vote, especially not if they live in one of the areas rife with voter suppression hurdles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Okay, this is going to sound really esoteric especially because I can’t find the study that was referenced but bear with me.

I once watched an astrophysicist lecture on the Fermi Paradox, saying that it was missing a component because not all the population will be aware of any specific meme, meme in the scientific sense of a single unit of information.

There was a study (I think in the 80s?) that showed that no matter what the information there will always be a percentage of the population who is isolated from it, whether that be by choice, or not. He retooled the Drake equation to include this number.

Point being, there is always benefit in trying different ways to reach more people because there’s always going to be certain people who won’t be reached.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Those people probably aren’t registered to a political party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’d be OK with Romney for Kamala’s VP.

He reformed health in Michigan Massachusetts when he was there.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Massachusetts…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Thanks. My brain wants coffee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

legitimately the most westwingpilled universe. also the last Republican candidate i respected

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Didn’t romney also march during covid in support of the CDC and quarantine? He’s got a lot of shit policies and ideas but he ain’t all bad I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wait until it’s revealed that this is all a part of his master plan. Becomes VP, assassinates Harris, calls it an official act, announces America’s new name, New Canaan, a Mormon theocracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I wouldn’t like it, politically, but it’d be funny as hell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly half of why I’d be OK with it. We need better humor in dark times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

With an organized, armed attack on the Capitol in 2021 and hints at another one after this election, we can’t afford to have a republican as the runner up to POTUS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

They always do this shit, appeal to the right while shitting on their own. In the meantime they shift the entire party to the right

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Maybe they think appealing to those already committed to voting for you while rejecting those on the fence is a shitty strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They can do that without shitting on their own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The problem is that the Democrats get so obsessed with chasing, “moderate,” Republicans that they lose their own base to low enthusiasm and low turnout. Remember what Chuck Schumer said:

“For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.”

He said that in 2016, and predicted that not only would Hillary Clinton win, but that the Democrats would retake the Senate. Turns out that was a spectacularly bad prediction. The candidate swap has generated a lot of enthusiasm for Kamala among the Democratic base. They shouldn’t squander it trying to appeal to conservatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Damn. For like two weeks there I was excited about this election. Thought the DNC was finally listening to the left. Turns out the VP to the “Nothing will fundamentally change” president is just as bad.

But, there’s still time for me to be proven wrong. If I had any faith in the DNC, maybe I’d think this campaign will be about showing non-fascist conservatives how much they actually have in common with progressives; like how much we’re all being exploited by the owner class and how much money the government could stop wasting by just giving everyone free healthcare already.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

^This is a part of forum sliding tactics, if you ever wanted an example.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments