cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/23108955

“I was prepared to go on stage to craft a statement, saying he decided not to go on stage because of fact-checking… we couldn’t compromise on that.”

As [NABJ president Ken] Lemon was preparing that statement, Trump walked onto the stage.

12 points

I mean, we all know that virtually everything that comes out of Trump’s mouth is 100% grade-A bullshit.

But when he says that he is unwilling to participate if he’s going to be fact-checked means that he knows that everything is saying is a lie. He just admitted to it. Nobody who believes that they’re telling the truth is afraid of being fact-checked, especially not to that degree.

He literally was telling the NABJ that he’s not going to participate if he’s not allowed to lie.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

It’s not quite the self-report that you think it is. Refusing to accept fact checking is a rational decision in the hypothetical framework that the participant is being honest and the checker is unreliable or dishonest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I doubt he’s capable of such a complex thought

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“I’m right. Everybody who disagrees with me is wrong. ‘fact checkers’ disagree with me, so they must be lying.” Is well within the person woman man camera TV brain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Saying ‘nu-uh… you are…’ is right up his alley.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
4 points

Huh. “Audio issues” must mean " I said things and they didn’t instantly accept them as facts".

What a way that live.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

What’s worse is that (a) She’s a FOX employee, (b) she repeatedly kowtowed to Trump throughout the interview, and © she was feeding him softball questions. And he still attacked her, blaming her for the “equipment issues” that nobody else was experiencing. And he kept doing it even after she went along with him about those “equipment issues”.

It’s like stockholm syndrome with some of these people. He attacks them, they bend the knee, and he attacks them more. And she went on FOX and defended him for it afterwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Refuses to go if fact checked. Provides a bullshit excuse for not going, gets immediately fact checked about it.

Suck it, Damn Old Trump

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

It’s so fucking annoying that the propagandists have already brainwashed his base into believing that fact checking is just “media lying” so they actively want Trump to refuse any fact checking…

We see it for the shit it is, and they like it. It doesn’t hurt him at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Kinda off topic, but I appreciate how nice and clean Axios is without an adblocker, and how concise and bait free the articles (mostly) are.

I don’t know how they stay sane and still make money, when the rest of the internet is worse than the Idiocracy TV.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 214K

    Comments