81 points
*

In Trump v. United States (2024) …

That is the most accurate possible name for the supreme court’s recent decision.

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s a pretty accurate description of the last 8 years TBH.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Senate shenanigans are always fun to read about.

Also, we learned that they’re “separate but equal” branches of government in school. Let’s see if the legislative branch can claw back some level of influence.

permalink
report
reply
65 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Oy, of course you’re right 😅

“Coequal” I think was the term I remember learning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

…we learned that they’re “separate but equal” branches of government in school.

Samsies. But then again, I don’t think normal people (our founders included) ever expected a willful collusion by a party to stack those branches of government in their favor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thank you for pointing that out. It is an important distinction that carries a lot of weight for a lot of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The founders didn’t intend for the SCOTUS to be an equal branch of government. They just kinda started doing constitutional review, and multiple founders were explicit about how that’s not what they intended.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

More like our founders would be shocked that we haven’t rewritten the Constitution yet, and horrified that centuries later we’re treating it like some divine scripture

There are multiple mechanisms in there to modify or even rewrite the whole thing. They totally saw this coming, they were pretty vocal about it. They hoped future generations would build on their work, not enshrine it

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

So now introducing bills and doing their fucking jobs is “ambitious?” These sucker’s make like $200k just in base salary and are the most unproductive decade of Congress I think ever.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It’s good to be king. Get paid to do nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The Constitutional Amendment is more bulletproof, but a much heavier lift.

This one will end up at SCOTUS, with an expected outcome. Slow moving trains and all.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

The Court wouldn’t have jurisdiction. They could overstep their authority anyway but it’d probably become a constitutional crisis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As opposed to the other times in recent memory that they overstepped their authority, lied about the facts, and rewrote laws and the constitution?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lying about the facts and rewriting laws isn’t legally prohibited. This is different because it would be the Supreme Court breaking the law if it viewed a case outside its jurisdiction… or, well, it could be different. It depends on whether the other two branches of government just roll over and let them do it. If Schumer is willing to use jurisdictional stripping the Democrats might be willing to go even farther if the Court decided to ignore the law. Hence, constitutional crisis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Earlier this week, President Joe Biden proposed a constitutional amendment to overturn Trump

Lol

permalink
report
reply
7 points

That’d require a forklift.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.6K

    Posts

  • 156K

    Comments