cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/20332183

Fight for the Future writes:

“The controversial and unconstitutional Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) is officially dead in the House of Representatives. Reporting indicates that there was significant opposition to the bill within the Republican caucus, and it faced vocal opposition from prominent progressives like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rep Maxwell Frost (D-FL).”

Evan Greer:

"KOSA was a poorly written bill that would have made kids less safe. I am so proud of the LGBTQ youth and frontlines advocates who have led the opposition to this dangerous and misguided legislation. It’s good that this unconstitutional censorship bill is dead for now, but I am not breathing a sigh of relief. It’s infuriating that Congress wasted so much time and energy on a deeply flawed and controversial bill while failing to advance real measures to address the harms of Big Tech like privacy, antitrust and algorithmic justice legislation. "

Thanks to everybody who took action ove the last year to stop this bill!

127 points

Article doesn’t say why republicans opposed it, but I guess this is one of those “broken clock” moments where they were accidentally right but for the wrong reasons.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

They probably opposed the idea of safe kids, given the rest of the platform. That, or there was lobbying money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Considering the tech industry would need to use more money to enforce the law, it would be cheaper to just buy out politicians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Their official line is based in fears of surveillance and government overreach. My state senator Mike Lee was one of them, must have been a cold day in Hell or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Please don’t perpetuate “think of the children” nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m not, it’s the name. The joke was that they saw the concept of safe kids in the Kids Online Safety Act and never read further.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

I’m gonna go out on a limb and go with “Can’t give Democrats anything that looks like a conservative win” for $500 Alex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That and good old reactive contrarianism. Dems say yes, we say no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Then why did they support it in the Senate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Cause Senators are generally less reactionary than the house. They can usually afford to play a long game that House members can’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
-45 points

Yeh tbh not sure why users here are opposed to KOSA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Read the article

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

The condensed version is that it creates a lot of avenues for a very loose definition of “keeping kids safe” that could easily include “information about dealing with bigoted family” being called “dangerous” at the discretion of an executive branch appointee who thinks that lgbtq identity is “unsafe”.

It also provides more avenues for the government to remove otherwise legal speech from the Internet entirely on the grounds that they have asserted that it’s “bad for children”.
This is literally the long running joke about how you pass draconian laws, and would only be made more on the nose if it was “keeping patriotic kids online safe for the future tax cuts of American freedom”

In general, the government should not be able to silence speech that isn’t immediately and unambiguously harmful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Because I think the government should fundamentally not be in the business of telling us on the Internet what we can talk about, how we have to design our websites, etc etc.

https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

The members of Congress who vote for this bill should remember—they do not, and will not, control who will be in charge of punishing bad internet speech. The Federal Trade Commission, majority-controlled by the President’s party, will be able to decide what kind of content “harms” minors, then investigate or file lawsuits against websites that host that content.

Ripe, ripe, RIPE for abuse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can’t go looking for logic in hate

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The reason is obvious, the Democrats wanted it to pass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Reminder to always keep up the fight. Even when things seem inevitable, fights can be won. That goes both ways: don’t get complacent and don’t get despaired

Get active, and get involved

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Kosa means scythe in Polish. What a name…

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Wow. Now I know 1 polish word!

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Great news!

But honestly, when something is voted down, there should be a cooldown period, where you couldn’t vote for it again.

It both stops these people making a new bill every year, and at the same time, actually have the people writing the bill doing a good job.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

I mean, good, but how the hell did it get 90% of the senate?

permalink
report
reply
41 points

Senators don’t give a fuck about their constituents.

Maybe this is different in Rhode Island and Wyoming, but in Cali the Senators don’t even have offices to take your calls if you’re a pleb. It’s like trying to get customer service from Google.

My US rep actually does constituent services and horror meets with non-rich constituents in person sometimes!

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I can always find my senator pretty easily. I just fly to Cancun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Only when the power is out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Our Alberta MLA, who was also the Minister of Transportation, would sit in his agricultural equipment dealership about 2 days a week and take meetings all day with anyone that wanted to come in and talk.

He fixed a lot of people’s problems with a few phone calls from there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m curious what riding you’re in

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You want hard mode?

Try to get customer service from Steam, I’m almost convinced Valve doesn’t actually have a head quarters and Gabe Newell might be an ancient secret government AI hiding on various reels of magnetic tape in some dank basement at Area 51 that not even the President is allowed to apply to be the janitor of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

SAVE THE CHILDREN!!!

That’s how.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Thank goodness the GOP in the house cares not about the children. They definitely voted against it based purely on the majority of Democrats that voted on favor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Republicans will block anything that Democrats propose, purely out of spite.

Occasionally, when Democrats propose something awful, this actually works in the people’s favor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The Republicans definitely care about the children, but only in contexts that are deplorable and disgusting. Just ask Epstein’s buddy Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 131K

    Comments