35 points

As someone who has read an absurd amount of fanfiction, I’m willing to bet that this (adults holding the idiot ball) was done on purpose because if the adults aren’t morons then there’s no plot tension for our protagonists to resolve.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AdultsAreUseless

I don’t know if this is quite the correct trope, but it’s close, at least. It’s common in any kid/teen story that the adults are complete screw-ups, and it’s up to the brave child heroes to do anything about it. I always think of it as the Goonies plot (my first obvious exposure to the trope) but I’m sure it goes back way further than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

“Why is everyone so dumb?”

Inbreeding. The answer is inbreeding. It makes sense of Hermione being the smartest person at hogwarts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Hey, not all the adults are incompetent. Some of them, like Dumbledore, are malicious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I remember first hearing Big D talking about letting Harry die for the cause. Oh, my preteen heart couldn’t handle the thought! “Like cattle?? How dare he!” and so on.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s actually it’s own mathematical system encoding data fractally in a way that seems just as “logical” (and operates on similar geometric systems) as string theory today.

https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/circle-theorems.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
243 points

Let’s be real.

Rowling started out making a fairly bog standard magical kids book. It was all about the fantasy of being a wizard, and relied on tropes so old they get found in La Brea.

This isn’t a bad thing. There’s nothing wrong with that kind of kid lit.

But she wasn’t a good writer. She was mid tier at best. So the eventual success of the series got beyond her abilities. While the last book was much better overall than the first few, it still relied on shoddy world building because she had chased sales.

She tried to turn a kid’s light fantasy into a YA fatasy-adventure. To an extent, it worked. And I don’t mean that it wasn’t successful, she had a hit on her hands because the idea behind it all was brilliant. It pulled from a long history of British youth fiction, and added in fantasy and magic and a ton of tropes.

But from the perspective of a coherent story in a coherent world, ignoring the success in terms of sales, it was cobbled together without a plan, and it shows. It wasn’t until maybe order of the phoenix that she had a plan for how the story would end, and she had to do a lot of hand waving to make it happen.

Again, that’s okay. Nothing wrong with a bit of light fiction. But, it had cultural impact way beyond its original scope. So it draws the same kind of analysis that something like LOTR does, and it just can’t compare. It barely holds up to comparisons with Narnia, and Narnia at least kept things vague and mystical without trying to get into the mechanisms under the hood.

For whatever reasons, Harry, in the books, long before the movies, resonated with kids. So the series exploded. And now everyone pokes at it like it was ever supposed to be literature, with any serious thought behind it. It was all broad brush strokes on construction paper from the beginning, expecting anything in it to hold up to scrutiny is like expecting politicians to be honest and up front. It is what it is.

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*

Agreed on all points. I view fiction like this the same way I view junkfood TV shows/movies/music/etc. Yeah, it’s often brainless, but if you shut your brain off and go with the flow, it can be enjoyable. Just don’t consume too much of it, because then you’ll start to actually think it’s something more than it really is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

I always say - to defend the series (which doesn’t need too much defending, it’s the most successful book series after the old testament > new testament > Quran trilogy). The magic of Harry Potter is that all of the fantasy magic works exactly as well as it needs to right at the moment that it’s directly in front of the readers eyes. As you mention, as soon as it leaves the view of the characters in the story, it literally blows up into nonsense. However, as the story is being told the magic used is awesome and just what the plot needs at that exact moment to move along.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

To be fair, Harry Potter is probably more logically consistent than the Bible is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

That’s like saying that an arthritic dog probably walks faster than one without legs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

as the story is being told the magic used is awesome and just what the plot needs at that exact moment to move along

That’s bad writing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deus_ex_machina

a plot device whereby a seemingly unsolvable problem in a story is suddenly or abruptly resolved by an unexpected and unlikely occurrence

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Michael Bay movies aren’t fun to watch because they have airtight plots and intelligent writing. They’re fun to watch because there are sparkly things going boom and it looks pretty.

The Harry Potter series is effectively the same thing. A spectacular story that’s fun to experience the first time through.

In both cases, if you think too hard about it, the thin veneer giving the appearance of coherence disappears and you’re left with a logically inconsistent mess.

It’s not going to stop me from watching Independence Day or reading Prisoner of Azkaban again though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was about to comment- Harry Potter and the Deus Ex Machina thanks for beating me to it.

I might add Harry Potter and the Order of the Pipe Layers

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As the person before me mentioned, scrutinizing the magic expecting it to be high literature is self-defeating. I never said I would defend the story on the merits of its writing, it’s a book series written for young adults.

Deus ex machina is egregious when a story that has otherwise been consistent pulls the rug out from under you with a twist that makes no sense. The magic in Harry Potter is consistently inconsistent, as I mentioned it only makes sense when it’s directly in front of the readers eyes. It doesn’t just show up as deus ex machina that saves the characters life at the end of the book and leaves the reader feeling betrayed, the reader expects magic to save the day because since page 1 magic has been doing whatever has been conveniently cool to move the plot along in the main character’s favor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s bad writing.

Eddie Valiant: You mean you could’ve taken your hand out of that [hand]cuff at any time?

Roger Rabbit: No, not at any time! Only when it was funny!

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Let’s be real here, she started off just writing a fun story, think nothing of it, and it became a cult. There’s two ways to go about this; 1) milk it for everything it’s worth, or 2) let the fans go apeshit on fanfic without providing anything more. She chose option 1. Cause money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Arguably I think all the flaws combined with its popularity is why there are so many HP fanfics out there and they are at least part of the popularity of the work.

It’s like confidently posting a wrong answer on the Internet, people can’t help but want to correct you. Same with her story, which fuels a good chunk of the dialogue and discussions about it.

If it was bad or unpopular no one would care. If it was extremely well written, with little to no plot holes, people would like it, but that’s kind of it. Harry Potter just seems to have the right mix of good ideas and poor execution while remaining popular enough to be relevant to generate seemingly endless efforts to fix or improve it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

And now everyone pokes at it like it was ever supposed to be literature, with any serious thought behind it.

terf lady doesn’t help herself by incessantly insisting that everything was planned from the very start

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

To say it more bluntly: That whole story ark was cobbled together by an amateur and is barely hobbling on crumbling crutches. In regards of storytelling and consistency it’s one of the most shitty dilettantic book series I’ve ever encountered. And the characters aren’t coming alive, they are just bland and boring.

Really bad books.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

She’s a billionaire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We have a saying in Germany: Eat shit - millions of flys can’t be wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Narnia at least kept things vague and mystical without trying to get into the mechanisms under the hood.

You open the hood and it’s just C.S. Lewis crouched in the engine bay, smiling gently and saying “the lion is Jesus.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

“But from the perspective of a coherent story in a coherent world, ignoring the success in terms of sales, it was cobbled together without a plan, and it shows. It wasn’t until maybe order of the phoenix that she had a plan for how the story would end, and she had to do a lot of hand waving to make it happen.”

“But she wasn’t a good writer. She was mid tier at best. So the eventual success of the series got beyond her abilities. While the last book was much better overall than the first few, it still relied on shoddy world building”

Excellent explanation. The first HP book is excellent. It really sucks you in. After book 4, the quality declines and they become slogs to get through.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Also in the wizarding world they have a device that makes it incredibly easy to kill a baby. It’s called a knife.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Technically with the mother’s love protecting him, nothing would’ve worked. Also you are ignoring pride in all of this. Voldemort had a way to kill anyone he hated with barely any effort on his part, using magical abilities. He also hated muggles and all they stood for. Of course he won’t be using a way muggles kill one another if he has magic that is in his mind “better”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

shame none of the other characters were loved by their mothers

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Well Lily sacrified her life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think the explanation is that Lily used old magic that nobody else knew about. Like, it wasn’t just her love, it was a special spell powered by love, in the same way the killing curse is powered by hate. Like, imagine the government is coming to bulldoze your house to build a freeway bypass, and you’re such a big history nerd you pull out some legal precedent from the time of Arthur that says they can’t do it. It was a highly situational spell that nobody bothered to teach to the next generation because you can only use it once, and she just happened to read the most history books on obscure spells.

Alright I’d better insult this series to make up for defending it. Putting Santa hats and beards on the severed slave heads is ghastly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

The mother’s love protecting Harry caught Voldemort off guard. It’s not like he got to try using the killing curse on Harry several times. Imagine you want to kill a baby, and you have a gun, and literally no reason to conserve ammo. You wouldn’t pull out your knife in the off chance that the baby is bulletproof.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Imagine you want to kill a baby […]. You wouldn’t pull out your knife […].

How true

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Makes sense once you really think about it, huh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Don’t tell me how to stab a baby.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

One might say this is one of the reasons Dumbledore wanted Slughorn on his side.

Though, I’m sure Snape could have made it too, and if Voldemort ordered him to make some, I don’t see him getting out of it.

The in-story reason why Voldemort doesn’t seek help in this way is pride. He believes he is superior, and thus, should be capable of killing Harry unassisted.

“Listen, Severus, I want you to brew me a cauldron of Felix Felicis, but I can’t have the other Death Eaters finding out about it…” No, he could never admit to anyone, neither Snape nor himself, that he needed such a handicap to kill a teenager.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

He Who Must Be Named Voldemort made that potion with Harry’s blood - that sounded really complex. Voldemort should’ve been using it* and distributing it to Death Eaters.

(edit) *Felix Felicis

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You mean the “get your body back after dying with a horcrux” potion? Yeah, I’m sure that would really come in handy for lots of Death Eaters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
20 points

Wait, the reason they don’t use this potion is that it’s hard to make?

Wouldn’t you make it once and use it to make more by just dumping random ingredients in a pot to get an infinite supply? It seems like the wishing for more wishes situation pretty straight up.

This is what I get for letting you trick me into thinking about this dumb thing, I suppose.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It was also toxic if you used it frequently

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

So, the Elder Scrolls method, eh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Naw

Would crack you all out

But it makes no sense it’s not consistently used as much as possible, exactly below the threshold for negative side effects. Anytime the good guys are fighting the bad guys. Anytime the bad guys are searching for good guys or trying to evade them. Whoever managed their liquid luck use better should’ve won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Wait, so it gets you high on top of everything else? People would be using this even if it did nothing else, what the heck?

Stop it. Stop making me think about the stupid wizard thing. Not worth it. So dumb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Indeed alcohol is a global best seller in our own world and for it to make you lucky someone else has to drink it too

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Now that I think about it, Felix Felicis in the HP universe is basically an analogue to atium in the mistborn saga.

Mistborn did it a little better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Gambler’s high.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Interesting vial shape

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I thought the problem with that was that the side effects and duration are a bit unpredictable, so you can’t optimize use where you can be sure you’re acting under Felix and going with the flow is optimal vs it having worn off but you’re still giddy and reckless and going with the flow is fatal.

Though ocme or think of it I may have got that idea from a fanfic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh I like that nerf! I think when it’s wearing off of Harry he just feels less and less lucky until he returns to normal. I only remember abuse leading to giddiness and recklessness. But that’s fun and appropriate!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 8.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 833

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments