-10 points

Making a free tier.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

I don’t know what makes you think this would be a “free tier”; it’d just in all likelihood be an even more enshittified, slightly-less-money-flushed-down-the-toilet-for-an-inferior-product tier. https://archive.ph/mwfWY

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That’s how it starts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Time is money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It’s never just a “free tier” unfortunately. Most times these headlines pop up, it’s “We’re increasing our base subscription cost, but don’t worry! You can keep paying the old price if you’re ok with ads.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Paying for ads is a terrible idea companies have forced into the narrative, without users really caring.

I choose not to pay for ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, if I’m paying but forced to watch ads I’ll drop the subscription, fuck that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

Your daily reminder that by paying for streaming services, you’re receiving a worse product than the alternative.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I refuse to pay for any streaming services. I am in the 1% of consumers taking a stand, and have had zero impact in the trajectory of video streaming the entire god damn time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There are dozens of us!

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

What is the alternative? Piracy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

buying physical media

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Hell yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Content advertising isn’t “on brand” for Apple, so this would be a bold move.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Advertising in general has been a growing revenue stream for Apple from my understanding. That “anti-tracking” they added a few iOS versions back also conveniently increased Apple’s ad revenue because other advertisers didn’t get the same data that Apple would just have by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’ve lost count of the volume of times I’ve been downvoted for stating that Apples transition to a services based company guaranteed they would become the enemy of every users privacy, regardless of all their virtue signaling about privacy.

Meanwhile, in the 2020’s you can not longer do offline dictation at all, on a several thousand dollar machine, without agreeing to sending PII and transcripts of all your dictations to Apple servers… You could do completely offline dictation a decade ago, on a machine that was about 1/10th as powerful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I think we passed that point after the ads in the App Store,News app, Books app, and Music app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Agree they’ve being easing their way in for a while. My point was specifically about advertising within the content itself which would be a new line crossed.

Edit: actually yes they did do this with Apple News didn’t they! (Which is why I stopped paying for it).

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

You know what is on brand for Apple? Making tons of money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

While there’s a bit of a focus here on what it’d “mean” for Apple to do this … more broadly, which streaming services don’t have ads by now? Prime and Netflix do, I know that much.

Basically it seems the industry has done exactly what cable did IIRC … once they’ve got you by the balls they’ll squeeze you as dry as they can.

Apart from finding a local hardcopy rental shop (I have and am trying to use it as much as possible), or you know, just not watching, “reverting” back to piracy is likely the only way to react here.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

The problem is mathematics.

Capitalism requires that profits always increase, but we live on a finite planet, with a finite amount of land, a finite amount of resources, and a finite number of humans… always, eventually, the ONLY option to continue this dichotomy is to squeeze your existing customer base, and extract as much value from them as possible (by devaluing your product). Unfortunately customers do not hold unlimited value, so the house of cards will collapse one way or the other.

Clearly, the only solution is to wage a war on mathematics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thats never the ONLY option, its just that the biggest winners in capitalism also make the rules, so they choose to always be the winners

There are other options of course, but those require the proles choosing something besides escapism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Finally!

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments