-4 points
*

So… just to repeat myself for the 300th time

This is a good example of why people use GitHub

Because it’s an advantage that it’s hosted by a large company like Microsoft. There’s very little chance it’s going to be shut down or sold off. So developers don’t need to worry about their infrastructure as much

One of our projects failed because we got caught up in infrastructure.

It’s funny though how the people who are the most vocal against GitHub aren’t responding to this post. But they’re happy to make the biggest deal about every little button on it…

permalink
report
reply
5 points

And Microsoft wouldn’t fuck up with GitHub? Or sell it to god.onows who? You sure about that?

Gitlab is at least open source, I can host it myself

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Just cause something is owned by a big company doesn’t mean it’ll last forever, example Google and their dead list of products.

Host gitea or forjeo if you really care about your infrastructure and data. If you can’t, make some compromises and pick the next best thing. But owned by big company doesn’t mean lasts forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Github is probably the biggest code hosting platform. There is literally no evidence that Microsoft will discontinue it… And they’ve spent a huge amount of time integrating it. It also generates 1 billion in revenue, so why would Microsoft sell it? Furthermore, its free for open source…

Self hosting is part of the reason our project failed… We wasted a lot of time with that stuff. We used Mercurial, whatever the Canonical one was, and git, and we wasted a lot of time.

Github works, and is well integrated to everything

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just pointing out that just cause its owned by a big company doesn’t mean it’ll last forever.

Also the FOSS community is by in large sus of Microsoft cause of their history practice of embrace, extend, extinguish. Which one would argue they embraced FOSS to gain easy access to their projects, the issues, the code, etc to train their models. Which would be OK if all code it generates has to be GPL to agree with the licenses of the collective pool of training data. Either way that’s the topic of debate.

It sounds like you looked into your constraints and github works for you. That’s great! And that’s what’s important.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I would like to say I’m not too concerned by this personally, as long as all their data remains public to all.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

An other one bites the dust :'(

permalink
report
reply
7 points

GGs

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Don’t worry everyone! It’ll get bought by some investment firm or by a large company (Microsoft [to shutter it], Google, etc) and everything will be just fine.

Right?

sigh

permalink
report
reply

Programming

!programming@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person’s post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you’re posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don’t want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



Community stats

  • 3.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 753

    Posts

  • 5.8K

    Comments