I have no idea what this post is trying to say
Two XX chromosomes = biological female, XY chromosomes = biological male. If jesus had no father, he couldn’t have Y chromosome, so he couldn’t be a man, which is conservative argument against trans people.
Cool idea, but probably too smart for people who argue that chromosomes and gender are the same thing. Besides, if you already believe in god and magic, then saying that Y chromosome appeared out of thin air isn’t that far off.
Well, we country people have our own homespun wisdom, and I do admit it may be beyond some city-slicking folks’ abilities to comprehend. But the fact that Jesus Christ our lord and saviour was transgender is not that complicated. He told us that our faith could move mountains, and sure enough, it was our faith in Him that made Him a man. Just as it is our faith that makes anyone a man, woman, or nonbinary. It ain’t no fancy cell culture under a microscope that tells anybody who they really are.
Trans men are got damned men, and I won’t tolerate any city folk telling me different
I think I get you. I hope
Trans men are men
AKA an AFAB transitioning to male, are men!
AKA IN FULL SUPPORT OF TRANS GENDER RIGHTS.
I truly hope you mean that.
If you are saying you want to misgender people? Thats where we will strongly disagree.
If a man who was born with a hoo-ha decides he’s a man, then he is. That’s his individual right as an AMERICAN. It ain’t the government, it ain’t no scientist, and it ain’t his parents if they think different neither. It ain’t nobody’s business prying into someone’s personal life to decide who they are. I suggest you have a mosey on over to the sidebar if you want to understand how we do things in these parts.
Didn’t Mary get pregnant with Jesus by Zeus, or something like that?
It was a virgin birth. The lord chose her to bear her son, and there was no man involved. No male chromosomes, or any other of these Harvard “genius” terms for what them liberals think makes a man.
And it only took one bad translation to get from “young woman” to “virgin”.
It’s probably not a bad translation, when they invented the story of Jesus birth they wanted it to fit prophesy and cultural expectation - this is also why his mom was free from the original sin everyone else has, John the Baptist likewise but the church doesn’t fully go in on that one.
Regardless of Jesus being a real person or not his childhood is very clearly invented to fit the story, and its a magical story so its to be expected that it starts with magic.
It of course causes endless problems theologically if you take any of it seriously, Mary being free of original sin since her conception means that God had her marked out as the mother of Jesus from birth which kinda ruins free-will but also the very point of Jesus is that original sin can’t be removed without the most precious sacrifice- the son of god… but Mary and depending on your opinion John had it removed at birth without any sacrifice - so based on the two facts that God knew Mary would be Jesus mom from birth therefore also that Jesus would die on the cross then the entire thing is meaningless theater - he holds the power to remove original sin at will and the little drama couldn’t have gone any other way.
This sort of convoluted logic has bothered theologians for millenia, it’s the problem when a story created to convince illiterate fanatics that your version of the current meme religion is the one to give money to turns into the cornerstone of society and the base upon which everything stands for a third of the world.
Based and HRT pilled.
This one took me a second to connect the dots lol