Can someone eli5 why it would be so self evident that “no argument is ever required as to the need of a revolver at home, at the office, when traveling”?? They say it like it’s apparent. Maybe at home you’re worried about burglary, but what’s going on at the office?
/s for those meetings that could have been emails
un/s I think the point was more so that conflicts can arise anywhere, and maybe rule of 3s. With them invoking an always be prepared mindset.
re/s Also a lot of people really don’t like their boss. Which is a selling point for employees and employers.
$175 in today’s dollars (+ $17 for every inch on the barrel) sounds like a sweet deal to me, or $210 for hamerless version.
Hammerless was/is used to refer to revolvers without a exposed hammer to snag on things. Basically so you can take it out of you pocket faster. It would still technically have a hammer. Although other firearms designs use a striker mechanism instead of a traditional hammer.
Damn I want a revolver
I luke that there is no limit to the additional barrel length.
Of interest to me…
-
No mention of caliber. That would be somewhat unusual when advertising a specific model today.
-
“Bbl” abbreviation for “barrel”. I thought that was a modern boomer misabbreviation but apparently it is very old.