142 points
*

If he won’t debate her, then I think after every one of his rallies she should start dropping tiktoks, youtube shorts, or whatever, where she replays something he said, and then debunks it with hard facts.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

I feel like they should be doing that regardless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The targeted audience will never see it. Spam him on TS with “It’s been X days since DJT realized he was too scared to debate the Vice President.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

She’s should get a Trump impersonator to say these things live on stage and then debunk them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

Honestly, I love this, but I think the impersonator aspect cheapens it. Take clips of things he’s said and play them on a screen behind a podium across the stage from her. Have a moderator prompt the clips, have her rebuke/fact check them. Done.

He doesn’t want to debate? Fine, we’ll have the debate without him. He’s already said what the people need to know. We just need to cut through the mountains of indecipherable bullshit he’s said while meandering around the point. Do him a favor and edit that down to his actual stance, as succinctly and clearly as possible. Don’t turn it into a joke making fun of how terrible he is at speaking, show people what he really wants to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Holy shit, that would be legitimately great television.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Imagine Kamala debating Alec Baldwin as Trump. I know he’s persona non grata right now, but Trump’s meltdown would be bigger than Vesuvius

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That would be funny, but I dont think it’d land well at all. She’d be mocked like when Clint Eastwood debated the chair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Alec Baldwin. It’d induce aneurysms across the right. Probably thin out their voter ranks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Have Baldwin do a skit about shooting him

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

“It wasn’t supposed to be loaded!!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points

Fucking coward.

permalink
report
reply
88 points

Claims it was because Obama hadn’t endorsed her and she might be replaced.

The Obamas Endorse Harris

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I love the timing on all of this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points
*

This is some real shit. This is what I want to see. A black woman is going to grab him by the pussy, get into that diminished mind of his, drive him further into dementia. Imagine the indignity he must feel. Some top-notch mindfuck shit.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Bussy

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Donald has a gussy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

No. Definitely a pussy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

Brave brave brave Dementia Don bravely ran away

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*
3 points

His three election foes as the three-headed knight. Harris could be the head that wants to kill him. Hillary’s the one that wants tea. Biden is the one with the hiccups.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Bone spurs. That’s why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

I love how weak and pathetic he looks now. More in line with who he actually is.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.2K

    Posts

  • 152K

    Comments