Democrat Angel Ramirez defeated Republican Bernie Hayes in an Iowa special election for the State House, in what the Democratic Party hailed as a “clear rebuke of Trump.”

Ramirez secured 79 percent of the vote versus Hayes’ 21 percent, according to preliminary results for the state’s 78th district in Cedar Rapids.

But turnout was just 3,470, or 17.4 percent of registered voters in the district—down sharply from the 11,168 votes in 2024.

6 points

Safe blue seat in a state legislature. Yawn.

permalink
report
reply
33 points
*

I don’t think it’s a clear rebuke of Trump when only 17% of the voting population participated. If anything, it’s a clear sign that if you can get more people out to vote for you in an off cycle, special election, which probably received little publicity, then you’ll probably win.

Had turn out been higher, I would be willing to bet that it wouldn’t have turned out as a win for the Democrats.

That all said, I’m glad Ramirez won.

Edit: Fixed a typo

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Usually low turnout benefits the Republicans. This is potentially every Democrat coming out to vote against Trump while Republicans stayed home because they don’t like Trump anymore but can’t bring themselves to vote for a Democrat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Didn’t you hear? Republicans don’t have to vote anymore. Their dear Orange Messiah told them they didn’t have to vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m still trying to wrap my head around that one…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

i wish the R did more of non-voting, they did more harm by voting for republicans in general.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It it’s like the other recent votes, it’s actually republicans turning out to vote for democrats. I think both Florida and Michigan(?) had less democrats and more republicans turning out, meaning that republicans are turning on the party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This was a safe democrat seat, Ramirez is replacing guy who was a union organizer before becoming a state senator. Cedar Rapids is a fairly liberal area, it’s one of 3 to 5 blue dots in Iowa every election. The other two being Iowa City and Des Moines.

This isn’t a clear rebuke of anything, of anything it’s an omen when so few people even bothered to vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

One seat is promising. Doesn’t mean jack until 2026 though - call me then.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

is this for HOUse, or state house, house of the us is more important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

See? All you COMMIES saying Chuck Schumer and the DNC are STUPID for doing LITERALLY NOTHING WHILE TRUMP DEPORTS AMERICAN CITIZENS AND DESTROYS THE ECONOMY can go Cry as the Democrats continue WINNING ELECTIONS! And then doing NOTHING after they Win!

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments