87 points
*

If Amazon had any balls, they’d display the cost without tariffs, then the costs with tariffs and use your “I did that” image pointing to the tariffed price.

Hell, every retailer and business should do that.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Except Bezos is in that “i did that” group. That was one of the only campaign promises that Trump was sure to keep, since it was the only way he would be able to afford his tax cuts for himself and his rich buddies like Bezos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Bezos did do that. He squelched WaPo pre election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

slammed Amazon for reportedly planning to display the cost of President Donald Trump’s tariffs next to the total price of products on its site.

Their plan exactly mr. Admiral

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, yeah, I got that lol. My suggestion was to add vegeta’s “I did that” image next to the tariff price (like they display the badge for Prime price).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That puts bezos in difficult position. He got involved personally to censor washington post articles against trump then critisize him on Amazon?

“I did that” is something bezos says to himself everyday

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Honestly someone needs to write an extension that does this.

If I have some spare time and the ability to grok tariffs I’ll give it a stab.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We will see if he has balls by whether or not he actually does it. Saying and doing are two entirely different things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

This should be in Leopards ate my face for both Trump and Bezos. Bezos paid good money through the inauguration fund (and probably other channels) and got screwed on the tariffs. Trump thought he had Bezos in the palm of his hand and didn’t. LMAO.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

This is the only reason I clicked. To laugh at both of these undeservedly rich assholes who thought the other was actually on their side

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That’s the fun thing about narcissistic sociopaths working together. It’s only a matter of time before they will turn on each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I think Bezos long-term plan is to pressure Trump to back down on tariffs, then keep prices high anyway and keep Trump tax cuts.

The oligarchs will infight, but at the end of the day, normal people lose either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I always want to think the worst of bezos et al but:

If the plan was just to jack up prices they wouldn’t make this distinction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

Fact:

n. a hostile political act, specifically designed to make Donald John Trump look bad.

permalink
report
reply
-14 points

Are you saying that haishan immigrants eating cats is not a fact? Csuse thats what your comment is saying

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Sure it’s Leopards, but how is Bezos reporting the truth of the cost a hostile act?

This is such a Cluster B personality disorder style reaction. Malignant narcissists lash out at anyone who contradicts or provides evidence against their false reality, and every malignant narcissist constructs a false reality for themselves and the people around them. Classic. Toxic. Definitely a page from the cluster B personality disorder playbook.

I’m no defender of Bezos, but the additional costs need to be publicized.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Truth and reality have a liberal bias.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Having several malignant narcissists in the family, it’s so true about the false reality. It’s a constant pack of lies and gaslighting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

“Why didn’t Amazon do this when the Biden administration hiked inflation to the highest level in 40 years?” Leavitt asked.

Because Biden didn’t affect Chinese inflation? You fucking rubes.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 317K

    Comments