11 points

The reason mainstream media switched to “both sides” after four years of defending Biden and pretending he was perfect is instead of Biden getting to place another corpo friendly DNC chair, the DNC got to vote and picked the most progressive chair in over 50 years.

Is Ken Martin perfect?

Nope, but billionaire owned media turning against the party almost on the day he was elected should be enough to tell us it was a victory.

Now is when progressives need to rally around the DNC, the neoliberals will vote Republican like they did in 08, but there’s so few neoliberal voters it won’t matter now either.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

mean when Democrats were falsely advertising hope and change but never followed through as usual and Obama just went to basketball games, but the workers never got living wages and nothing else happened from all the empty promises

just enough crumbs were given out to brainwash the citizens into thinking Democrats were on their side and to hold up the two-party sham even longer with the basis being Republicans are evil

both parties are just elite puppets putting on a grand theatrical performance

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

mean when Democrats were falsely advertising hope and change but never followed through as usual and Obama just went to basketball games, but the workers never got living wages and nothing else happened from all the empty promises

Was that 50 years ago?

Did Obama nominate a progressive DNC chair or did he ignore the DNC because the neoliberals running it actively worked against him, which allowed the neoliberals to remain in control of the DNC?

Because buddy…

It seems like you’re not informed about the topic.

Quick edit:

To clarify I mean the first time the DNC pushed a more conservative candidate than Dem voters wanted in an attempt to steal Republican voters: Jimmy Carter.

The fact that he’s remembered as the last “true left” president shows how much the party has fallen. At the time the party was fractured because Jimmy wasn’t progressive enough for the Dem voting base. And we’ve only moved right since the, until the 2025 DNC chair election.

Battles have been fought and the war was won, neoliberals do t run the DNC anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

the problem here is that nobody takes the time to think about how civics actually work in this country. the most important, qualitative elections people can participate in are municipal and state ones, but none of y’all ever turn up. guess who has been voting in municipal and state elections since the 80s? if you already guessed in your head, you’re probably already correct.

if you want living wages in your area, start by electing a mayor or city council that will actually do it. if you want police accountability, make your city or town do it. hate the entire political system that works in your area? you actually have the power to change that! they’re basically the last civil workers who actually have to be somewhat pragmatic and not operate entirely on polemic lines. nobody cares if you’re republican or democratic if the sewers aren’t running.

it’s not that hippy-dippy — the phrase “think globally, act locally” is basically the play from here until forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the problem here is that nobody takes the time to think about how civics actually work in this country.

This rapper does an amazing job of breaking down why people don’t vote, what elections they need to be voting in, and why so many people misrepresent our political system.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wMALeR1i-FM

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I don’t really want neoliberals in my coalition anyways, I don’t like associating with people who smugly talk over other people to push shit ideas that don’t work while innocent USians are suffering and dying everyday. I also don’t like associating with people that bring nothing to the table but a liability to the legitimacy of the political coalitions they assume they are the heart and soul of.

spits on the ground heck no I am never rallying around the DNC again and neither are other younger people, corporate centrists can come begging to our feet for our vote and we will give it to them if they stop wasting our time with empty feckless promises.

It is up to the DNC to prove to the people holding the gas cans that it is reformable, and so far their argument still sucks.

Try harder lights match while whistling jeopardy theme.

Still waiting for proof centrists learned anything from this election other than that they are ok with genocide and that we must always accept the framing of conservative arguments and move right (which is the only thing US centrist neoliberals seem to be capable of concluding).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The solution is to have no parties. Everyone just runs for office on their own

permalink
report
reply
3 points

That only works if truly nobody is “backed” by a larger organization. Taking away party affiliation just makes it harder to identify where a candidates loyalties lie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No candidate should have loyalties to any group other than the American citizens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nice thought but literally impossible. Everyone has loyalties to something.

And people already can’t be bothered to know what the stances in major issues between the two main parties are, you really expect the average voter to research random individuals?

Have you ever tried looking up info in those local school board candidates? Half of them don’t have anything online at all. Still, despite how easy it is to make a website

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The first past the post system will still spoil the vote with more than two candidates. The solution is ranked choice voting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, yes. Ranked choice and no parties. ;)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ranked choice is a step in the right direction, but Approval Voting is better and more intuitive, imo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sorry, I can’t keep up with all the new models and I thought ranked choice was in some way a catch-all for “models that don’t suck like first-past-the-post”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We could go down this rabbit hole all the way to Schulze, but IMHO it’s more important to unify behind anything clone-independent just to get out from under this duopoly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
2 points

Agreed. The Looters’ Party is the reasonable choice. The best part with those guys is that you get to keep whatever you get your hands on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

The problem is that the ‘Not Perfect’ party refuses to actually fight or advocate for universal, popular policies. Instead, the "Not Perfect’ party sits on their hands, bullies their base, and waits for everything to collapse so that they are the default option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

So vote in the “Not Perfect” parties primaries to get better candidates nominated, and at the same time work on getting a ballot initiative for ranked choice voting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

How’s that been working out over the last 40+ years?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Is the “Not Perfect” party even going to hold a primary this time or does Harris get it by default like Biden last year?

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

They railroaded Clinton into being the 2016 candidate and appointed Harris as the 2024 one. The DNC leadership doesn’t care what their constituents actually want.

Uncoincidentally, that’s why said leadership needs to be replaced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The “not perfect” party got us gay marriage, the affordable care act, and the repeal of don’t ask don’t tell. The response was Trump’s first term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The “not perfect” party got us gay marriage

Actually that was the Supreme Court not dems. Plus even around Obama it was a questionable subject for dems

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Support ranked choice voting! This is the best way to move away from a two party system presently available to us. Also, Freakonomics had a fun episode on duopoly (episode 356)

permalink
report
reply
1 point

My state rejected the state-wide RCV measure in November :⁠-⁠\

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Jesus, if only there was a party the was in the primaries that supported a voting system that isn’t first past the post.

Oh wait.

https://www.progressivecaucuscenter.org/ranked-choice-voting

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments