0 points
*

Ruby:

a || b

(no return as last line is returned implicitly, no semicolon)

EDIT: As pointed out in the comments, this is not strictly equivalent, as it will return b if a is false as well as if it’s nil (these are the only two falsy values in Ruby).

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Python:

return a or b

i like it because it reads like a sentence so it somewhat makes sense

and you can make it more comprehensive if you want to:

return a if a is not None else b

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

This diverges from the OP code snippets if a has the value False.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And no one on his team ever understood his code.

Sometimes being declarative is better than being “smart”

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I’m confused on how this is difficult to understand. Put aside the fact that it’s just a regular operator that… I mean virtually everyone should know, how hard is it to google “what does ?? mean in [language]” which has the added benefit of learning a new operator that can clean up your code?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Well yeah but imagine you had to do that on most lines of the code? It would become very distracting imho. If you are in a team with people that have a lot experience and or will learn more anyway this is fine. But if you are in a team with not very good programmers which “will never learn” because they have other stuff to do, you should be careful when using code like this. Though I would prefer in the former of course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m learning swift and I actually just discovered ?? today. Am I missing out in other languages?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Yes, it’s very useful when applied correctly.

I’m always disappointed when I remember, that I can’t use such a feature, because I’m stuck using Java.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Maybe you’r using an older version of Java? Works fine for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

New versions of java have a null coalescing operator?

I didn’t know that.

Edit: a short search didn’t return any answers, as far as I can see java doesn’t have this operator, the closest thing is the ternary if operator.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I enjoy this:

return a.or(b);

But yeah, that requires an Option type rather than null pointers…

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Is that Rust? Assuming a is an Option (which would be close approximation of OP’s nullable type) and assuming b is not null, then this would be closer to the original idea:

a.unwrap_or(b)

It returns value of a if it’s not None rather than Option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Ah, true. Thanks.

Theoretically, it was supposed to be pseudo-code, secretly inspired by Rust, but I did get that one mixed up.

And I am actually even a fan of the word unwrap there, because it follows a schema and you can have your IDE auto-complete all the things you can do with an Option.
In many of these other languages, you just get weird collections of symbols which you basically have to memorize and which only cover rather specific uses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Except there’s literally no change in performance as a normal compiler will treat those the same. It just looks nice and trim down the time an experienced dev reads and understands the code by around 200ms.

permalink
report
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 6.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 796

    Posts

  • 7.3K

    Comments

Community moderators