95 points

“First and foremost, I know – as a former federal prosecutor and as a defense lawyer for decades – that a person who is a judge, who has a residence who has no problem being found, should not be arrested, if you will, like some common criminal,” Gimbel said. “And I’m shocked and surprised that the US Attorney’s office or the FBI would not have invited her to show up and accept process if they’re going to charge her with a crime.”

The cruelty is the point

permalink
report
reply
60 points

Even this guy got to turn himself in when he should have probably been marched in chains

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Speaking of common criminals…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That picture will always look like stable diffusion generated to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s specifically intended to resemble Hitlers mug shot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This should’ve been his “AL Capone” moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

They want to make an example of her to show how far they will go to get others to fall in line.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points

When people are loosing their basic civil rights, I’m not going to guzzle tears because some judicial pig didn’t get the special treatment she was owed according to her station.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

sure buddy those ARENT CONNECTED AT ALL

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

You may misunderstand her role in the scheme of things. Please consider re-reading the basic timeline of this story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

From his profile:

I don’t read my replies

This waste of space owes existence itself an apology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

If the most you can muster to defend a judge who didn’t want to act as a deputized federal agent for ICE is, “The way the FBI went about this was unprofessional.” Then perhaps you shouldn’t be interviewed on matters of fascism.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
-15 points

On one hand she doesn’t deserve this. On the other hand it’s kind of nice to see a judge get to experience the absolute bullshit of the legal system and police overreach firsthand.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

What do you think they do all day?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You don’t know what firsthand means do you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m not convinced you do.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments