HOLY CRAP 190% at time of writing from France!!

damn France is killing it👌🔥

Current Leaderboard (as of 9:21 UTC [July 26, 2024])


  1. France 190%
  2. Germany 101%
  3. Denmark 88%
  4. Belgium 67%
  5. Italy 47%
  6. Netherlands 38%
  7. Slovenia 28%
  8. Slovakia 23%
  9. Austria 21%
  10. Spain 19%
  11. Finland 16%
  12. Luxembourg 15%
permalink
report
reply
3 points

This is a good test subject for us Americans. We will get to see how this pans out and hopefully then decide what’s right for America.

Good luck!

permalink
report
reply
7 points

That’s really really optimistic considering how well universal healthcare works everywhere compared to the US and yet there’s no change in that regard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Les critères pour définir un « ultra-riche » devraient varier d’un pays de l’UE à un autre en raison des différences économiques, fiscales et sociales entre les Etats membres. A titre d’exemple, en Belgique, nous proposons que toute personne qui dispose de 1,25 million d’euros en plus de son habitation principale et des avoirs affectés à son activité professionnelle soit qualifiée d’ « ultra-riche ».

If disposable assets (in addition to your house and normal expenses) of €1.25M counts as ultra-rich in Belgium what is rich then? And well-off? Isn’t the whole “eat the rich” idea targeted at billionaires which is a whole other level than this definition?

permalink
report
reply
1 point

1 million is like a good salary for 30 years (3.000€ Net for almost 28 years, 3K€ is great here in the EU).

If that’s not some exceptionnal richess, well then I think it should be. Of at least tax them somewhat (the richer you are here, the less you pay in taxes)!

Billionaires are just ridiculous, parasites of the society, and should be taxed til they are just stupidly rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I agree that I would not call it “ultra rich”, but I don’t see why you shouldn’t pay more taxes at that point. You’re clearly still incredibly well off, and the ceiling & opportunities are much higher for you at that point too, to make even more money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Call me crazy but having €1,25M in assets (beyond your professional assets and home) while there are still people in need seems like a fine point to start contributing more to society and less to further increasing your personal wealth. If I had anywhere near that much money, I’d happily double my tax rates if it went to supporting those who can’t support themselves and assisting those who could benefit from it.

I also suspect the home value exception is a major loophole here. The rich would begin investing more than ever into their homes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

€1.25m doesn’t sound “ultra rich” to me. It sounds like a successful small business owner. €100m, sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

The “idea” stems from envy. It sounds good when it targets billionaires, but it will end up taxing anyone slightly well-off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

So let’s put it at 1000 euro then, since that’s so arbitrary

permalink
report
parent
reply
-80 points

Tax the rich, and the rich will leave. When the rich leave, good luck getting a job since there are less places to work. Got no job? Enjoy being poor! Wanna start a business? You can but your better off working a 9 to 5!

If I was rich, I would avoid countries with high taxes and countries that target the rich since why the fuck would you as a rich guy live in a country that robs you with joy?

permalink
report
reply
19 points

If I was rich I would live wherever made me happy, probably somewhere with lots of nature, and I’d be happy to pay my share in taxes cus I can trivially afford it.

It would be incredibly depressing to be rich but only find joy in hoarding money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

why the fuck would you as a rich guy live in a country that robs you with joy?

Everyone has to contribute to the system. Calling taxes robbery is just bullshit.

Anyways, the whole “the jobs will be lots” thing is bullshit too. As long as there is value to be extracted capitalists will employ people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

The rich can leave if they want. They can’t take their assets with them so we can tax the shit out of their assets while they pack their bags. The whole point of this is redistribution of wealth. This isn’t targeting a doctor or lawyer or some other highly paid individual earning six figures, this is targeting the truly wealthy, People hoarding generational wealth

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

This isn’t targeting a doctor or lawyer or some other highly paid individual earning six figures, this is targeting the truly wealthy, People hoarding generational wealth

You’re wrong. Their definition of “ultra-rich” is suggested to start at €1.25M of disposable assets. That would easily hit doctors and lawyers in EU countries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah but that’s not including a primary residence or any salary based remuneration. So if you take that into account then it’s entirely reasonable as a starting point. It also states that the calculation would be influenced by cost of living in a given country so places with HCOL would potentially be a larger amount.

Don’t forget as well, it would likely be modeled on progressive taxation therefore any tax of this nature would only apply on anything above the €1.25M proposed figure

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Those rich fucks don’t contribute anyway so let them move into the desert where they can be tax free with no infrastructure, security, or amenities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Up to a certain point, the rich don’t leave a country because of high taxes, there are studies that support it.

Also, the rich usually are not the biggest jobs providers, most of the time in developed countries, these jobs have already been moved to China or another cheap labour country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That’s why an EU-wide measure is useful. Obviously, only a global measure could truly prevent rich people from just moving to a different country, but making it more annoying to dodge taxes than to just move a few hundred kilometers, is already a step in that direction.

In particular, on a rational level, these rich people do not need to care. They have significantly more money than they could ever spend. At best, they’d want to dodge taxes to get their high score to grow more quickly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

How do those boots taste?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

So why don’t all of the rich just leave and go live on an island together where there’s no tax and no poor people?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Signed from Finland

permalink
report
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 8.6K

    Comments