31 points

Here is the link to the actual eu voting page:
https://eci.ec.europa.eu/038/public/

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Thank you. Signed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Very nice initiative. Please send the link to people you think might sign. Especially if they are located in countries that haven’t reached the quorum yet.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

What are the countries that have met the quota, apart from Germany?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

France

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

ah fuck. We hate rich people too much. Dont have anyone I can send it too then….

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I really hope this gets enough support to progress

permalink
report
reply

HOLY CRAP 190% at time of writing from France!!

damn France is killing it👌🔥

Current Leaderboard (as of 9:21 UTC [July 26, 2024])


  1. France 190%
  2. Germany 101%
  3. Denmark 88%
  4. Belgium 67%
  5. Italy 47%
  6. Netherlands 38%
  7. Slovenia 28%
  8. Slovakia 23%
  9. Austria 21%
  10. Spain 19%
  11. Finland 16%
  12. Luxembourg 15%
permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Les critères pour définir un « ultra-riche » devraient varier d’un pays de l’UE à un autre en raison des différences économiques, fiscales et sociales entre les Etats membres. A titre d’exemple, en Belgique, nous proposons que toute personne qui dispose de 1,25 million d’euros en plus de son habitation principale et des avoirs affectés à son activité professionnelle soit qualifiée d’ « ultra-riche ».

If disposable assets (in addition to your house and normal expenses) of €1.25M counts as ultra-rich in Belgium what is rich then? And well-off? Isn’t the whole “eat the rich” idea targeted at billionaires which is a whole other level than this definition?

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I agree that I would not call it “ultra rich”, but I don’t see why you shouldn’t pay more taxes at that point. You’re clearly still incredibly well off, and the ceiling & opportunities are much higher for you at that point too, to make even more money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Call me crazy but having €1,25M in assets (beyond your professional assets and home) while there are still people in need seems like a fine point to start contributing more to society and less to further increasing your personal wealth. If I had anywhere near that much money, I’d happily double my tax rates if it went to supporting those who can’t support themselves and assisting those who could benefit from it.

I also suspect the home value exception is a major loophole here. The rich would begin investing more than ever into their homes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

€1.25m doesn’t sound “ultra rich” to me. It sounds like a successful small business owner. €100m, sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

1 million is like a good salary for 30 years (3.000€ Net for almost 28 years, 3K€ is great here in the EU).

If that’s not some exceptionnal richess, well then I think it should be. Of at least tax them somewhat (the richer you are here, the less you pay in taxes)!

Billionaires are just ridiculous, parasites of the society, and should be taxed til they are just stupidly rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

The “idea” stems from envy. It sounds good when it targets billionaires, but it will end up taxing anyone slightly well-off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

So let’s put it at 1000 euro then, since that’s so arbitrary

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 3.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 8.6K

    Comments