106 points

A welcome mandate, especially for electronics. However people are already throwing away so much perfectly fine furniture that I don‘t think it will help much in that regard. A lot of people want something new, not something that just works.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

Where are you living? Here people give away (emmaus for example) or sell it online, for cheap equals you don’t even need to throw it away, someone comes and picks it up for you.

Those appliances are so simple too, making them durable is very low cost. Good move EU.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Where I live you can easily give your stuff away or donate it to a charity shop, but it’s a tiny bit less effort to chuck it in the trash so there are people who do that. Not all of them, thank god, but you can come across decent stuff every one in a while. Do have to say people are more likely to dump cheap stuff than reliable stuff from known brands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Yeah they buy new because the advertisements give you idea that new is cool, brainwashing one into consuming. We should ban ads

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Disposable culture is a blight on society…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

This is absolutely true and sad, though I get a lot of free electronics to dismantle by rummaging through trash. People have no appreciation of the value of “used” items that either work perfectly fine or have a minor issue that prevents them from working but is easily fixable, e.g. a broken cable (I have many working devices that were thrown away because the cable is severed, which I could easily fix). I think only proper education in this regard will improve things long term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

People have been conditioned to throw away perfectly good shit, now we are surprised they throw away shit. This policy is obviously not gonna fix the issue on its own, but as you said, it’s welcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I specifically want new because I already know even the new won’t last long don’t even mind something someone has used for a few years already

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, for furniture, I totally agree with you and honestly: I don’t think there is eomething wrong with redesigning your living room every 10 years, especially when you move around.

I mainly want to be able to buy old washing machines, dish washers, TVs, because I don’t care about their appearance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If the produced stuff last longer it wouldn’t mean there would be less competition on innovation, people would still have a reason to sell you their old appliances because they want certain new function. This law is against making stuff that can’t be repaired or breaks easily. Don’t think you’d buy a 2 year old tv if it doesn’t work, right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If it’s quality furniture you can sell or donate it. If it’s recent Ikea or other cheap stuff, it won’t survive being disassembled, moved and reassembled. Ikea’s surfaces scratch so easily, even on desks. It’s ridiculous. That kind of fast furniture is terribly unsustainable. But I wouldn’t be bothered if you bought a new sofa every ten years and make someone else happy with a used sofa that will last another ten years in it’s new home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

And work without apps.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

You can buy LED lightbulbs that all have their own apps. It’s getting ridiculous

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

To be fair most do work without the app. The app is for remote control and other features like colors usually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just use home assistant, you don’t need their hubs/apps (assuming they use a standard like Zigbee or zwave). For wifi try tasmota.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They should just force them to open the API, this would be sufficient in most cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points
*

Imagine, government of the people, by the people, and for the people - that’s crazy SoCiAlIsM talk!

permalink
report
reply
-47 points

Longer means more forever chemicals

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Right, so if they break down faster the forever chemicals disappear faster. Is that what you mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Do you even know what forever chemicals are or do you think they’re a magic thing that are added to machines to make them last longer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Companies literally add pfas to everything to make things last longer

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’d love to hear how you came to that conclusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not necessarily, you can use more steel, stronger parts. And if forever chemicals become a problem, you can regulate them just like with everything else. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not really, it means mechanically working longer not forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Back to the good old days when products were of higher quality. What a concept.

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

I’ve heard this from service techs who have worked on my refrigerator and dishwasher - major appliances in America last a third as long as they did 10 or 15 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

they are truly junk. the only goal of American industry, it seems, is to make more money than ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Always has been.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And that’s nothing. You know how they’re pushing for washing machines, dishwashers, etc. to be internet connected? Currently they’re forcing this for data mining purposes. But I have no doubt their real goal is to eventually make these devices like printers, with expensive consumables locked in by internet-connected DRM. They’ve already gotten people used to using dish and clothes detergent pods. How long until they’re putting everything in plastic cartridges, locking things down with DRM, and charging like printer companies do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I can tell you from firsthand experience it’s even worse than that. I had a washer that lasted me damn near 20 years that was made in the 90s. Finally decided to get a new set from Samsung. Made it just past warranty, or basically 1 year. The repair would have cost as much as the washer was new. Similar experience with an LG fridge. Bought it and the ice machine broke in it, TWICE, within the first year. Fuck these brands and their established hold on the market.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Money burns the world to the ground

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My washing machine is around 25 years old. Not giving it up till its absolutely done haha. But since parts are relatively available, it might just be a few more years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The washer, dryer, dishwasher and fridge my wife had when we got married were already old and all lasted 20 years more. The fridge was the first to go, and in the 12 years since then they have all been replaced twice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

And to a world where repairing is both possible and feasible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We have a Bosch washing machine we bought second hand 15 years ago for £50. It’s basic, not digital, but has all the functions we need. We’ve never had a problem with it. It will break one day but I’m hoping it lasts a lot longer still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bosch makes good appliances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

We really need to stop with this “build to break” mentality for products. Our wastes, as humanity, would significantly lower and reduce wastes…. But hey, we also have to think of the investor’s, right?

permalink
report
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don’t question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don’t post uncontextualized images or videos, and don’t start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

  • on any topic: RT, news-pravda:com, GB News, Fox, Breitbart, Daily Caller, OAN, sociable:co, citjourno:com, brusselssignal:eu, europesays:com, geo-trends:eu, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
  • on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
  • on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they’re the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any “thinktank” type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don’t link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 8.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments