Summary

$150 billion: that’s the grand total of savings Elon Musk revealed last Thursday that he and his DOGE team are “expecting” to make after months of ruthless and often mindless cuts.

To call this a monumentally unimpressive number doesn’t do it justice. Musk’s “savings” here — which are already error-ridden and inflated in the first place, created by totaling up spending that never actually existed or that was, alternately, either already cut or never actually was — represent just 15% of the trillion dollars he originally promised he would slash.

In fact, government spending so far under Donald Trump has actually gone up compared to the last two years under Joe Biden.

“Musk will have effectively crippled the modern American state and ripped vital services away from ordinary Americans in order to pay for more waste at the Pentagon.”

137 points
*

“Musk will have effectively crippled the modern American state and ripped vital services away from ordinary Americans in order to pay for more waste at the Pentagon.”

So, mission accomplished then? I never believed for a moment it was ever about reducing waste / increasing efficiency. At best, it was scrounging the government couch for change to pay for tax breaks for the rich.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Well, yeah. He should have named it the Department of Dismantling the Administrative State, but that’s not a meme.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

should have named it the Department of Dismantling the Administrative State, but that’s not a meme.

At least if you read the acronym backwards, SADD, it’s fitting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

DODAS or just DODS

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Hey, I just realized that the Department of Dismantling the Organized State could be DoDOS, or DDOS, both of which work too

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Department Engaged in Actively Dismantling the Administrative State Structure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

DDOS the government

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

The only waste in government is corruption. “Inefficiencies” are actually resiliency—a crucial trait of any social system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Underappreciated fact.

I was listening to conservative AM radio (combo of morbid curiosity and masochism), and they talked about a social security warehouse full of documents and how inefficient that is in 2025, and we should get rid of it.

I’m just like:

First of all, there’s no way that’s their primary data source. So if you’re crying for modernization, that already happened a long time ago.

But if you’re saying we shouldn’t preserve paper copies, then you’re opening the door to all sorts of terrible things.

Like, saying we should just trust whatever the government says and not have to prove it in a court of law, or making our systems vulnerable to hackers, or making it so certain government actions can never be undone.

But uh… I guess all three of those things have become hallmarks of this administration anyway, huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

The amount of money it’ll take to fix all this will dwarf the $150B. By several factors at least.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Good thing the US is trashing all their trade agreements, then. That’ll make paying for it so much easier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Also losing 500Bn in tax revenue due to DOGE cutting back IRS staff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

He did the absolute reverse of saving. He destroyed and cost the US TRILLIONS of dollars. The IRS alone will not collect an additional +$500 billion in revenue this year and every year going forward. Over ten years, that’s $5 trillion in extra uncollected revenue, and I’m sure this is a conservative estimate.

permalink
report
reply
32 points
*

You mean the IRS alone will not steal an additional +$500 billion from the poor, helpless billionaires this year, right? /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

for half a second I thought this comment was just poor because of how late the billionaires part came in the sentence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just enough to get the libertarians frothing before the scowl.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Actually, I’m not sure he does mean that. Is he taking about destroying the IRS’ efficiency collecting taxes from billionaires, or is he talking about destroying the entire US economy so the billionaires never earn capture that money in the first place? It genuinely could be either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

150 billion

Yeah and if you actually believe that to be true then I have a bridge to sell you. These dumb fucks sold 8 million as 8 billion

I’d be surprised if it’s even close to 15 billion

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

These dumb fucks sold 8 million as 8 billion

Even aside from stuff like this, things they claim to be saving tend to be cut contracts. Contracts that have already been paid, but will no longer have to provided what they’d been paid for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Also they lost like 500Bn according to the IRS due to cutting IRS staff alone, not including revenue lost as a result of cutting services that the government provided and revenue lost as a result of other nations no longer doing business with the USA such as arms sales, energy, rocketry, hospitals, and other transactions.

By all accounts DOGE is losing money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Same answer as the other reaction: if i start pulling on those threads then there is no end

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It also completely ignored the cost of the consequences, which is likely going to easily outpace any money “saved”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh inwasnt even gonna go there. Once you start pulling those threads it just becomes an absolute Avalanche of shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s probable that it’s way less than that, and that’s not factoring in whatever it’ll cost to unfuck everything he’s done. Not that that’s likely to happen anytime soon.

Also not counting in the brain-drain that is already happening.

I hope it’ll be better for all you normal human beings in the US at some point in the future, I really do, but fuck me if this shit isn’t scary all the way on the side of the Atlantic, and that’s coming from someone living right next door to Russia. I’m way more scared of what’ll happen when the US goes full 4th Reich.

I guess one could argue you’re already there to be fair, but I still hope it went too far too fast and a backlash is incoming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

The goal was never to save money but find ways to enrich himself.

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*

Ending democracy, that’s their true goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The working class has never had any form of democracy

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

That’s not true at all, even if you want to restrict yourself and only consider direct democracies as true democracies, you have at least Switzerland as an example.

In Sweden and Denmark, workers can even choose representatives to sit on the board of directors of the companies where they work (however, only for companies with more than 25 or 35 employees).

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments