cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28194139

Donald Trump and White House officials walked back a Friday announcement that there would be tariff exemptions on imported electronics.

In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump directly denied the tariff exemption announcement.

“This is really mind-boggling. If this was serious industrial policy, the main thing you want is certainty: ‘Here’s the tariff, it will be in place for the indefinite future, and you should plan accordingly,’” Dean Baker, an economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a left-leaning think tank, said, according to The Washington Post. “Here, it’s basically: ‘Come back next week and see what we’ve got.’ That’s no way to run an economy.”

164 points

The good thing is that there’s a steady hand on the wheel exercising unprecedented levels of power. He clearly has a plan to do things, undo them, redo them, undo them again, etc. according to a clearly defined plan.

Imagine if the guy claiming dictatorial powers was just winging it from one moment to the next. What a nightmare scenario that would be.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

The fart of the seal 🦭💨

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

We should make this emoji combo a thing, it’s beautiful in it’s simplicity. I, for one, will be using it more often.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

🦭💨

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Everytime I see Donald Trump’s picture, I make farts noises like he shitting his pants on purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

MOAR PLEASE

  • Republicans
permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

a clearly defined plan

I believe it was a concept of a plan

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’d be okay with going back to a concept of a plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

He puts the “if” in tariff.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

And the “con” in economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Maybe the con in panopticon?

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Feels like the trade policy of the United States is entirely made up by four guys in a room. That’s the wrong way to do politics.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

One of whom is inside-trading prior to each announcement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Only one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s far too generous. It’s one guy on a toilet with a phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It isn’t the work of one man or even five or six … it’s an entire political party and all their wealthy backers and supporters who are financing this circus that are either working at this, supporting it, enabling it or just standing aside and doing nothing to stop it.

Stop thinking that this is the work of one powerful person … it’s all enabled by an entire community of idiots that want all of this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I didn’t say that it wasn’t. I said what it feels like. I don’t want any politics to feel that way. It should feel like there’s an entire organized plan behind it, but it feels like it’s just some people throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks, which in itself is pretty shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Now I understand what trump meant that tariffs would make child daycare easier. Because if everyone is unemployed then they have more time to watch their kids

permalink
report
reply
12 points

we’re so past 5D chess that we’ve hit the Curse of Dimensionality…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

At this rate, by next week Howard Lutnick will be reading Reddit’s Wallstreetbets sub for advice on how to run the economy. The utter stupidity and incompetence are off the charts this month.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

There’s been rumblings of an impeachment attempt possibly happening because of these tariffs but I don’t trust the rumors. If Trump actually manages to get impeached over this or something else then I will eat my shoes. Feel free to screen shot to hold me accountable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

He’s already been impeached twice. A conviction from this Senate will never happen. They’d need every Democrat, the two independents, and would need to get 20 Republican senators to vote to convict. One or two I can see happening, but 20? Never.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s why I said I’ll eat my shoes if it happens. Because I don’t think it’s gonna happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right now to get impeached would require the Republicans in the house to turn on him, so if he gets impeached I would bet the senate would be more than happy to convict.

However, the house is where he has the most support right now, so I don’t see that happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It could happen, but the country would have to decline so far, that even Republican voters are screaming at their elected officials for action, or else. When they start feeling that their reelections are in danger, they’ll turn on him hard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The GOP will never vote to impeach him. They’re cowards who are terrified of MAGAts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah that’s why I dont trust it. Our realistic best bet at getting rid of him would be when he collapses the economy and chaos erupts. Hopefully whoever our FDR 2 ends up being (if we get one ) could rally the troops and we could have a disturbed land of confusion moment lol. That song and video has been in my head alot lately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He can read?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe a bit. Mostly scanning for those react emojis though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 323K

    Comments