80 points

“The question is not just whether it will work, but whether Republicans—including the former president himself—will have the discipline to keep the racial subtext of their new strategy from becoming the text.”

Narrator: “They won’t.”

permalink
report
reply
24 points

yeah, really not sure this is the winning strategy they think it is - that was from a time long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away.

they are mobilizing their insane against a now increasingly energized “broader coalition”. I have small hope again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Jumping all the way back to 1954 in Lee Atwater’s infamous timeline of the Southern Strategy and hoping the 2024 electorate will go with them is a bold strategy. We’ll see how it plays out for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

excellent read. thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I don’t follow the right wing grifter blog sphere at all, but I’ve already seen at least a half dozen Ben Shapiro types already call her a DEI hire. They will not be able to help themselves, because racism is one of the core pillars of the modern Republican mindset.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There’s a certain sweet irony in the “token DEI hire” being the overwhelming and enthusiastic consensus pick to take over the campaign. Not that I expect Republican commentators to make the connection, but at least I can enjoy it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*

“We see her as a candidate now, and we’re holding the bucket of paint to define her at a time of our choosing,” Chris LaCivita, the Trump campaign’s co-manager, told The Bulwark. “She owns the Biden record. We’ve got everything ready for what she did as [District Attorney in San Francisco]. And she was part of the coverup with Biden’s fitness to serve.”

They have absolutely nothing lol. This is the equivalent of “I would totally race that guy and win, but I just got my car washed, and I don’t won’t to mess up the detailing.”

It seems these morons have forgotten that the “Biden Record” is almost entirely positive, and the things Trump keeps yelling about are completely made up lies. They can go out and keep spouting the “Immugrent Inavyshun” bullshit, but all the numbers says it’s not true. Harris can go out and spout off numbers on the post-Dobbs FACTUAL issues, and back it up with real numbers. Pretty simple.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

This is true. Trump’s campaign team is not smart enough to understand Democrats. No one was against Biden because of his record; people just thought he was too old. I didn’t agree with them (because the results are fine), but it’s ok now.

Kamala is a good compromise because she is 20 years younger and is literally in the White House right now. I think her polls are going to go up now that she will be the Democratic nominee. Also, she’s been hitting trump hard on the campaign trail and enthusiasm is building.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think there was a good chunk that didn’t like some of his record. (Israel/Palestine, the old crime bill that was hung around his neck despite being broadly supported) But Kamala doesn’t have to run on that record, though she can still call on it as having been Biden’s VP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Biden had one really bad policy in his administration and arguably there are good reasons - just don’t genocide does no justice to how complicated the situation there is to navigate. By comparison, I thought Obama had maybe a half-dozen things I starkly disagreed with him on.

Hate on the Gaza situation, sure. As black marks go, it’s really dark, but I’m never going to agree with any president 100% of the time and Biden’s record is way better than most in my book. Kamala has a solid record to run on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Trump’s team also sunk so much money into “Biden’s old!/senile!/sleepy!” that they’re pissed about having to start over, because a character smear is their only tactic. If only the campaign had spent money on displaying past accomplishments, some improvement metrics, good character… oh wait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No one was against Biden because of his record

I wish that was true, but there are a giant number of people who think the economy is in the toilet. While inflation has been coming down, prices did go up, and inflation coming down doesn’t lower prices, it just makes them go up more slowly. Keeping the economy strong while also lowering prices isn’t realistically going to happen, but people don’t get that. They think it was better under Trump because prices were lower then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nah. No one thinks the economy is in the toilet. They just want their income to go up too. They want what billionaires are getting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points
*

permalink
report
reply
29 points

And my word, they thought Let’s Go Brandon was soooo clever. Most people had no idea what the hell they were even talking about, and those that did know, and were normal Americans, just groaned and rolled their eyes. They aren’t triggered - they just feel sorry for such people…meanwhile, these people even bought merch with that dumb saying on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There’s also just no creativity. I’m pretty sure I saw a new “let’s go Brandon” sign out and about recently. By this point that is very nearly a three year old meme. Like, I’m not really surprised that they can’t do better, but it’s a little telling that they come up with one thing they think is “good” and stuck with it basically though Biden’s entire presidency. “Creatively bankrupt” does not even begin to describe it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Maybe there is something about always punching down and the humor gene…there is probably some reason they don’t really understand satire and cannot really do comedy all that well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Oh shit. I just realized something that is 1000% percent coming if she wins the election. They’re going to sue to deligitimize the election when Kamala Harris as VP oversees the confirmation of the electors that she, Kamala Harris the President Elect, received becuase it “clearly biased/fraudulent/illegal” to perform her duties as VP to confirm her own election. I have zero doubt in my mind that this will happen.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Isn’t there precedent for that though?

Then again they don’t seem to care

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

There is and they don’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There is and we don’t care too. They can f*** off with that bs and so can SCOTUS

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Wasn’t a problem for GHWB.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Since when has precedent mattered to them? Or the current SCOTUS?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Yeah they constantly go “you can’t do that.” And then they turn around and instantly do that thing.

Another one they do is “This person will do this, this and this in this scenario.” And that person doesn’t do it but it turns out the one accusing them of it did it previously or is planning to do it.

Republicans shouldn’t ever be taken seriously anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

They can try, but an update to the law has since been passed to make totally clear the vice presidential role is purely ceremonial and that they have no power to challenge or alter the proceedings in any way.

https://www.npr.org/2022/12/22/1139951463/electoral-count-act-reform-passes

I expect like you say they’ll still make a big public stink and file some frivolous suits about it though like it’s a real issue when it’s not to rile people up though. And totally ignoring the other times this has happened before, like Reagan to George HW Bush.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points
*

“Trump planning to”

“. . Trump says in latest bizarre . . “

“Will Trump do the thing he said”

“Trump believes that . . “

So exhausting. The man’s a demented sociopath. He doesn’t believe anything. He’s going to do exactly what you think he’s going to do. Journalism has failed so spectacularly they’re just spitting out the same nonsensical headlines over and over like a fried robot.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 122K

    Comments