146 points

I don’t doubt things are going very well for him. He’s out of jail, hitting the links, and bribes are pouring in.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Don’t forget all the crypto grifting. Stocks could plunge another 50% and he won’t care, because that’s not where his money is. He might celebrate the dollar tanking if it means $TRUMP buys more dollars

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

And just today alone he gained new future golfing buddies Russel Brand and Jean Claude Van Damme!

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points
*

My stocks were a couple bucks shy of $10k on January 19th. Yesterday morning they were $8100.

Edit: down to $7700 this morning.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

I’ve seen a 30% drop since this whole thing began. I’m not looking to divest for another 18 months, but that’s assuming he doesn’t completely collapse the economy for years…

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Silly me for planning to retire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Silly me for retiring in January

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I have a 403B that I pay absolutely no attention to. I was curious, so I decided to look.

Three years of reasonably steady growth with what looks like a run of the mill transient dip at the end.

Almost $10,000 evaporated since March.

I see no reason to believe that it’s transient. I think it’s just the beginning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

After 2 years of gains my TFSA was $8k in the green on inauguration day. Today it is at $400

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

At least you did not put much money in the market

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bold to assume that’s not all of their savings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

I wouldn’t be surprised if he really believed that because all the yes-men around him are constantly telling him how great he is.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

What makes you think the stock market crashing is not his aim?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

People keep repeating this. It’s all on purpose because billionaire snap buy everything cheap

My question continues to be that, such strategy makes sense if you know what you bought cheap would be valuable again. However, trumptard has antagonised the WORLD, even if trade resumes, everyone would jack up prices for the USA to include the risk of another wave of stupid and nobody would sign any long-term agreement so you’d wind up not knowing if your product would cost 10, 20 or 50% more next quarter…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And traditionally once a price is hiked, it doesn’t go back down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because people are downright ignoring who he’s working for. His actions make absolute sense as a Russian asset. And no, he’s not trying to screw the US allies, at least that is not his main objective.

EU, Canada, UK, they’re just collateral damage. They’ll hurt but they’ll recover because while loosing the US they still have each other and China. And in their recovery they’ll help isolating the US. After they learn to live without the US it’s game over.

His main target is the US itself. He’s trying to collapse the US economy and isolate them to prevent from rising up again. He’s trying to destroy the US reputation in the international community. He tried it once but now he’s making sure it sticks. With a broken economy and no allies the US will loose its capacity to project military power. Even if a Democrat is elected nobody will ever trust the US again.

Trump works for Putin, it’s completely obvious. His job is to sabotage the US. And he’s doing a great job. And by the time Americans face the facts it will be too late. Maybe it already is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s probably multiple motivations. He serves a motley-crew of white christian nationalists, oligarchs (many with very fascist ideologies themselves), and himself. I think he’s kinda acting like a power-broker/deal-maker for many different people (similar to his buddy Epstein). The numbers don’t make sense because they don’t really matter if the goals are to 1) cause the world to lose faith in the US 2) can be used to negotiate things like de-dollarization 3) can be used to solicit bribes from politicians and businesses. If they really want to bring manufacturing back to the US, the dollar must be unseated as the world’s reserve currency, and there must be very bad stagflation so that we get enough inflation and depressed wages so people are desperate enough to work for roughly the same real wages as Chinese factory workers. If the US is less dependent on other nations for things like manufacturing, the US can do things like invade countries, set up slave and death camps, etc, with less consequence. And the chosen oligarchs get to rule over their own fiefdoms of oppressed workers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What makes you think the stock market crashing is not his aim?

I think it’s a combination of both that and stupidity, of both him and the oligarchs. Yes, they like manipulating the market and being able to buy up stock when it’s down and it was working for a while there, but they didn’t bargain on just how far trump would go and how much he would fuck things up. trump figured he could cow other countries they way he does Americans and since he can never admit he’s wrong, he’ll keep doubling down even though it’s not working, causing further havoc. I don’t think he believed China would retaliate with a 34% reciprocal tariff, and he’s not going to listen to the oligarchs when they tell him it’s time to back off. They installed into the presidency a monster they can’t control

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It does massively lower US hegemony

Would be a good move if he served Russia or China but a terrible one if he served the US

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Because he’s not that smart. It’s not even a Project 2025 thing, because it’s somewhat split on the issue of tariffs. In so far as it supports it at all, it’s mostly about working around some free trade treaties and tweaking things here or there. This strong, across the board tariff is entirely his own idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

My portfolio is down 40% since January. I’m just glad I took most of it out before it got too bad so I’ve only lost about $1,000. I was about to open a retirement account too but decided against it when things started tanking and I’m glad that I didn’t.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Tbf now is a good time to open a retirement account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Is it? You assume things will recover

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If it doesn’t recover, you’re no worse off than anyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If things don’t recover by the time I retire I have bigger things to worry about than retirement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It will. Eventually.

But it has a pretty long way to fall.

And a LOT that can happen before a “recovery”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Now it is, but 3 months ago when I got the paperwork to do it was not. My procrastination saved me some money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

40%? Were you all in on Nike or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s what I had left after I sold almost all I had, so it was kinda the dregs anyway. I wasn’t expecting much but 40% kinda took me by surprise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was just saying, that’s like 3x the drop the rest of the market saw, so you must have had a few very specific stocks that only had their supply chains through the hardest hit tariff countries

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Modern “Emperor has no clothes” moment.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Except in this case the emperor and all of his advisors have been telling people for months all about how he wanted to go around naked insisting that he is wearing clothing, and all of the dumbass peasants truly believe he’s wearing a beautiful new outfit in spite of the obvious fact that he’s running around naked.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments