Summary

A GOP-led procedural vote in the House failed after nine Republicans joined Democrats, halting legislative action for the week.

The vote’s collapse blocked Republican efforts to pass the No Rogue Rulings Act, aimed at limiting federal judges’ power, and the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote.

The failed rule also sought to derail a bipartisan resolution allowing proxy voting for new parents, led by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna.

With the rule defeated, Speaker Mike Johnson canceled all remaining votes until Monday evening, stalling key GOP priorities.

167 points

Republican women in our house of Representatives are demanding maternity remote work for themselves. Twelve weeks. That’s twelve weeks more than Americans get.

So they’ll have time off with their babies. And still get paid. With their free taxpayer funded Healthcare.

Leading the charge was Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla. She was in the freedom caucus, who opposed giving special treatment to women. But Luna had a baby last year. So guess what’s suddenly important to her now? She left the freedom caucus.

I fucking LOATHE Republicans. Their brains are broken that they can’t imagine something unless it happens to them. They’re too stupid or selfish, I’m not sure which. Pretty sure it’s stupid.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Definitely stupid. Also selfish, but definitely stupid. I’ve met too many of these god damn people that just cannot fathom seeing the world from the perspective of anyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I agree they are selfish but I’d be cautious assuming they are stupid. That is how we got where we are today. We assumed their stupidity and incompetence would be their undoing but the past 9 years have shown us that assumption was wrong.

It’s not that they are stupid they just don’t care about being a hypocrite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I guess I should say emotionally stupid. That doesn’t necessarily make them inherently stupid, but they just have a complete utter absence of emotional intelligence and do not care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

12 weeks is so crazy little. i got 8 weeks, as a father, and my wife took 78 weeks (at a reduced weekly pay)

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Babies have to learn to be self sufficient as early as 12 weeks so that they can enter the workforce and learn to be oppressed sooner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They yearn for the mines, not the moms

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Agree. They need to work at McDonald’s. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Twelve weeks. That’s twelve weeks more than Americans get.

Paid is the important additional criteria in your statement. Fmla keeps your insurance running and guarantees 12 weeks off work unpaid for maternity leave(for people working more than the pittance that is 1250 hours a year) — something many Americans cannot afford.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

that being said i am 100% in favor of new parents getting to at least work remotely in the House

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

shes one of those , i want my slice of cake i dint help buy or make, but a larger slice of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Congress gets the same health benefits as all federal workers. It isn’t free. https://www.cbo.gov/about/careers/benefits

I’m all for bashing congress, but continuing to throw out untrue “facts” learned from internet comments that were never verified might get more attention, but can make others disregard the rest of your statement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
132 points

I’m not sure if this is Johnson acting immature and throwing a tantrum because the GOP couldn’t get their way, or if he’s buying time to make sure they can get the nine Republicans into line before trying again.

permalink
report
reply
112 points

Definitely the latter. They don’t want to risk anyone else defecting in the meantime after repeated failures that make them look bad, so they’re looking for some other way to coerce the votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

It’s just a rule they can’t vote on it until Monday. Which was the original schedule until Anna Paulina Luna used the arcane rule to move it up. She probably did that because nobody comes to work on Mondays and she didn’t think they’d have the votes. She worked with a Democrat to create the bill and had a baby just a few months after being elected. She left the Freedom Caucus over it.

The 9 Rs didn’t like being pushed around.

Or, just maybe, some of them (plus her) are the ones that some of the more quietly persuasive Democrats need to be talking to off the floor…

Edit: Either way, I’m happy for anything that messes with the GOP pushing through their hate agenda. Delay, Deny, Defend us against tyranny!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Hold on… I’m having trouble unpacking this. Can you explain the math here? Did I read that this is all the result of internal GOP drama because someone had a baby?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There’s a bit of “strange bedfellows” involved here. Two women, one D and one R, realized they and anyone like them could lose their opportunities to vote on legislation (ie do their job) if childbirth or neonatal complications kept them away from the Capitol Building. So they sponsored this bill.

Democrats like it because it makes the job fairer to women. I presume some of the Republicans feel it fits their pro-birth agenda, and helps against women’s tendency to vote more left than their spouses.

They may also like the part that Johnson hates, which is that it opens a door to further proxy voting. Which he says is bad because legislators need to be in the same building interacting with each other, (which we can all see isn’t doing shit for bipartisanship) but mostly that rule is used for partisan gamesmanship, timing votes according to who will be present. He doesn’t want to have to learn how to work with a change in the rules.

Three bills got linked together as part of his shenanigans, so now all three are stuck until at least Monday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

that is true to get them to toe the line, but i suspect its a distraction for the wisconsin judge fiasco.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

A GOP-led procedural vote in the House failed after nine Republicans joined Democrats

Pog

I’m gonna start keeping track of who from each party is actually resisting

permalink
report
reply
14 points

This wasn’t a partisan issue. It was literally just letting new mothers vote.

I’ll call it resisting if the American people have consequences

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Those voter ID laws would have been the death knell for democracy, as they were in the Jim Crow South. Stopping them had incalculable benefits for the American people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

At least until next Monday.

Phew, the world is saved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

resolution to allow members who give birth or lawmakers whose spouses give birth to have another member vote for them for 12 weeks.

Well that sounds like a stupid proposition. The “other member” could simply use their second vote to vote however they want in absence of the lawmaker with a newborn. Surely there are better ways to handle this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Perhaps there could be some a voting form of sorts, which gets mailed to e.g. new mothers. And they have something like a couple of weeks to fill out how they wish to vote, I suppose they could sign it too if need be, then return it in a security envelope of sorts to the voting place.
I know it may sound like madness, but this form of voting-by-letters-in-the-trusted-care-of-USPS may sound a bit futuristic; but I am confident society can pull it off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It shouldn’t be a partisan issue, but it clearly is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I don’t like it. No one should vote on behalf of another representative. There are ways to vote absentia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Geez I wish I could just stop working when I don’t agree wit my coworkers.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

I quit a job after a coworker started yelling and screaming because I was told to go help them. I said I couldn’t work with them anymore.My manager said, “well you can’t pick who you work with.” So I turned in my shit ans left the next day. You actually can pick who you work with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I mean… You can

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You just might not be able to start again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Now accepting bets on when Trump dissolves Congress.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 317K

    Comments