244 points

People who got money to vote should be named and shamed.

permalink
report
reply
124 points

it should be illegal. that’s bribery

permalink
report
parent
reply
135 points

It’s already illegal. Unless the rich do it, of course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Pisses me off they get no accountability. when if you or I did it we would be locked up imminently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Unless I have the law wrong, he skirted the law. He didn’t pay anyone to vote (although he originally said he was), he technically only paid them to sign a petition. The law afaik only says you can’t pay people to vote (regardless of who, in Wisconsin you straight up cannot pay people to vote at all), you can pay them to sign a petition.

However I would argue that by first announcing that the money would go only to people who voted and then subtly changing it later is still totally a form of bribery. People absolutely voted for a chance at that money because of his original statement and didn’t know it changed. But I’m going to go out on a limb here and say he’ll be 100% fine because of technicalities (aka he’s rich as shit and is completely untouchable)

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

It was a pledge to vote, not legally binding. A lot of desperate people these days, and I can’t say I wouldn’t try to scam elon out of a million bucks if given the opportunity. “Sure sure, I’ll totally vote how you want Mr Musky sir. Make sure you spell my name right on the check now.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points
*

Yeah my internet history alone would eliminate me from that running.

The winners are “pre selected”. Thats how his bullshit workaround works. Its been admitted. But for the uninformed, it sounds like a lottery.

It isnt.

even if a communist or anarchist or whatever tried to play the game and if it were a true lottery, you would be committing a far worse disservice by keeping quiet at this point.

Stay quiet and maybe get a million. Its the democrat way if you look at our current dem politicians… do you really want to be like them right now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Every lottery run by private business is not a lottery but transfer of money from gullible to someone’s friends and family.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Could buy a lotta drones 🌻

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Understandable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Even so, the point of such laws is to be as impartial as possible. That’s not possible once people start accepting stuff. Doesn’t matter if they can still technically not vote.

It’s not because it’s guaranteed to sway votes, but because it could.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

I almost guarantee he canceled those checks the second she won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

no doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Some of those people probably took the money and voted Democrat anyway.

If someone was trying to bride me for a vote I’d take their money and still vote for whoever I wanted.

What’s he going to do? Look over my shoulder and verify who I voted for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Still, it probably has a chilling ef fect. Voting Dems becomes like a secret you have to keep rather than something you should shout from the roofs - less likely to make that post on social media, put up a sticker or a sign, tell your friend and family etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s not legally binding though. You could absolutely shout from the rooftops how you got Elon’s money and now you’re voting Dem, and encourage people to do the same. If enough people brag openly about doing it, it would be terribly humiliating for Elon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Point taken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I think he is skirting the law by having the payments be for signing a petition tangential to a vote, but not directly about voting. It’s scummy to say the least, and if you did sign, you’ll probably get spam calls and mail for the rest of your life. At least in this case, the outcome was that Elon didn’t get his preferred candidate to win, he’s wasting money paying people to get on his mailing list, and now when Tesla’s Wisconsin case gets to the state supreme court, Crawford will be on the court

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

From here:

permalink
report
parent
reply
138 points

The language used is super interesting. “Defying Elon Musk”

Defying. A terrifying word, yet appropriate.

Musk has no position in the Wisconsin state government. He’s not a constituent. You shouldn’t be able to “defy” him because he has no position of authority.

Yet they used the word “defying” and it’s terrifyingly the correct word.

permalink
report
reply
103 points

Eat Shit Elon Wasted 20 million for nothing.

permalink
report
reply
72 points

If we would assume that musk’s wealth is $400,000 then spending $20m is just $20.

To us this is massive amount for him it is $20.

And he bought US president for just $300.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

If we would assume that musk’s wealth is $400,000

Hopefully with Tesla stock crashing, this can be a reality

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

hopefully it will be $0.00000

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Hope so too, unfortunately SpaceX apparently is worth even more and we don’t have as much influence in their revenue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Fine, he lost twenty bucks then, Im thrilled.

I hope the anxiety causes him to smoke his entire ketamine stash in one sitting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There’s a way to smoke ketamine? I don’t know, I just ate it once and apparently it was the wrong way to do it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think people like him are so addicted to power and wealth, that I wouldn’t be surprised he would off himself if net worth would drop to millions.

Though with that much of wealth, I think no matter what he will do he will be a billionaire.

If we ever restore democracy, we need to concentrate on destroying oligarchies, apparently this already happened twice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You smoke ket??

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Technically his total wealth has declined to about $342 Bn, and technically that is only if he sold off all of his assets namely his Tesla stocks, at which point it would instantly become less than $342 Bn due to the market’s fast acting supply/demand price setting.

At any given time you should assume Musk has less than $30 Bn liquidity, which is still a fucking lot.

Also, he bought Twitter so you can say he spent a lot more than $300 to elect Trump. $300 was just his campaign contributions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s okay. He still has billions more to piss away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

55% to 45%

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Massive Blow Out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

A mandate even.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

A Mandate to tell Elon to eat shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Still 45% too many idiots

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Jesus. Turns out bribery has a cost o.o

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

This is the best news in 7 months

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 324K

    Comments