59 points

How could he even have been on any ballots yet when he hadn’t even been officially nominated?

permalink
report
reply
44 points

That’s sort of the point - this hesitancy was all bullshit.

The fact that the convention is so late does mean we’ll have to really scramble after it, though (and the convention is so late because of Biden’s specific request).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The UK had an entire vote in just 6 weeks.

Our information apparatus (print, TV, social media, etc al) is … Far superior to theirs, in terms of efficiency (not in terms of human dignity, relax, I am aware).

I feel like folks are forgetting just how addicted to information we all are, and how easy it is to get the whole fucking country talking about the same thing at the same time.

Trust me, the advertising budget for Squid Games ain’t shit next to the DNC war chest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

To be blunt, American election seasons are completely asinine.

As an American myself, having election seasons that essentially last somewhere between 7 months and 3 years is absolutely sanity destroying. It’s completely awful and I hate it passionately. It obviously also has a strong negative influence on our more responsible politicians actually, you know, trying to do their jobs in a meaningful sense. It’s all because it’s a super profitable exercise for a LOT of people. I’d be simply ecstatic if we had a system closer to France or the UK in that regard (and don’t get me started on the clusterfuck that is the electoral college).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In theory the FEC could address this by limiting the advertising season and going after candidates or news outlets that violate that limitation.

In actuality, the media makes far too much money turning it into a horse race.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

There are states that require candidates to register by a date that is often before the nominating conventions. Those states have always passed one-time exceptions when that occurs. If they choose not to in this case, using the last minute change as political cover, it could be a legal grey area, and who knows how it would play out with today’s judicial system.

On the other hand, those are red states that a Democrat wouldn’t win anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

…a situation where the electoral college is actually an advantage against election manipulation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Technically afaik the election institutions don’t care about parties, they care about the individual running. Remember the whole system was set up with the idea/hope that parties don’t exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well that was then. Presently if you’re not the nominee from a party which received a minimum threshold of votes in the preceding election you have to get a bunch of signatures from the voters to be put on the ballot. So since the Democratic party has.met the threshold of votes in prior elections in all states their nominee will be on the ballots but they haven’t nominated anyone yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sounds like the legal mechanism is that you need a certain threshold of support to be put on the ballot, but they carved out niche to just accept the nominee from the 2 parties with the understanding they would obviously meet the threshold of support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points

Who the fuck is panicking? I’m relieved.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

The people whose talking heads are telling them to panic are panicking

permalink
report
parent
reply

The right is in a panic and pushing this “questionable legality” and “it’s too late to change their candidate” nonsense. They are publicly running on the issues of banning abortion, putting tariffs on everything coming into the country, and mass deportation of “illegals” that are taking “Hispanic, Black, and union” jobs at record rates. That last part of which I don’t know how the media hasn’t called it out for being overtly racist and complete bullshit. Yet they let it slide at the debate, because they were all racing to write about Biden, and then again at the RNC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ve wondered what all of the people in lifted trucks with “fuck Biden” flags will do now, and how long they’ll continue to fly them

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Not here, but I’ve seen a lot of people chiming in who seem torn up/devastated that Biden dropped out. If they’re as convinced that we’re all screwed now as I was convinced that we were screwed with Biden staying in I can understand their feelings. I just hope that I’ve assessed the situation better than they have. I, like you, found a bit of hope today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

People spent the entire year defending that his brain certainly wasn’t diseased enough for him to drop out and it’s totally the right move to keep him cause at least he’s barely conscious. Give time, we gotta at least wait for the weekend to end for the new programming directives to kick in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The polls were pretty damning. I wouldn’t worry that it was the wrong move. Joe had some pretty heavy baggage that’s now off the plane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m on pretty much the same page. I felt like we were being forced into suicide-pact that involved sleepwalking into fascism, and now it feels like someone’s actually at the wheel and steering away from that possibility.

What happened yesterday is precisely what I mean - the goal here isn’t for any specific Democratic nominee (i.e. Biden) to win; the goal is to stop the fucking fascists. That’s what the situation calls for, and it feels like we’re doing that now. I understand that a lot of people feel locked into the process, but drastic contexts sometimes call for drastic measures, and this is that. It’s very similar to how Macron and his party kneecapped their own political chances to stop National Front from winning a plurality or outright majority in the Assemblée nationale. It was the right call, and it worked. And I’m fairly optimistic that this candidate pivot is going to work, too.

It’s not perfect, and it’s not a guarantee. Nothing in politics is. But I feel a good bit better about our chances than I did two days ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I do hope very much that you are right.

History though has not ever shown a late replacement candidate winning any big election, so I can understand the panic.
I am afraid the democrats chances dropped with Biden pulling out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

A few right-wing sources have been saying that there would be legal challenges to replacing Biden on the ticket, but it’s mostly just bluster and bunk. Some corners if Biden-world picked these arguments up as an excuse to keep him on the ticket, so they gained some traction, but there’s not much to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yesterday was… very interesting, for sure, but I absolutely understood that taking a day to let things shake out a bit was probably a good idea. I admit I was speculating wildly with a couple of my friend groups, but it was just that - speculation. I pretty much ignored all the pundits and major news outlets predicting chaos and catastrophe as a result of his withdraw (which, if I’m honest, is the same lens I usually view their predictions with) and I’m quite happy I did. Major media outlets are just clickbait competitions at this point, and yesterday was simply a chance for them to print some money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not panicking, nor do I believe that there’s no recovering from it, but I suspect that the probability of a Trump presidency increased because we’re no longer fielding the incumbent. The Dems definitely have time to prove me wrong, though, and I hope they do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She’s the vice president. The dems already accepted her as potential president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The Dems voted in 2020 against Trump, not for Harris. And they’ll do it again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

My question is if someone other than Harris wins the nomination, can Harris give over the elections funds? Were those funds donated to the Dems or to Biden/Harris specifically? Would there be legal donation issues to give them to someone else?

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

I’m a random person but my understanding was that legally the funds belong to the Biden/Harris campaign, now owned by Harris. I think moving that money between campaign funds is not permitted. Maybe some unprecedented swap where Harris remains VP would work.

Edit: i actually researched this, LegalEagle has a good video on it.

In short donations to DNC are safe, but the campaign committee for B/H would need to go into a super PAC and would face litigation risks

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh boy she’d like that I’m sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think the money can then be added into a PAC like “The Biden/Harris PAC For A Better Tomorrow” or some shit. Then, that PAC can be used to fund another candidate. Not 100% sure on it, but that’s my mildly educated guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I’m down to vote for who the fuck ever can beat Trump. I honestly don’t care at this point as long as Project 2025 and Trump are stopped. FAR too many people are going to be hurt by that and I’ll do whatever it takes to see that not happen.

permalink
report
reply

Vermine Supreme 2024! I want my pony!

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments