You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

I give up. You clearly have a wildly different understanding of the word intended.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You’re confusing “said he intended” with intended.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ok, clarifying further then, for my benefit.

I am trying to understand your position - this is my summary/interpretation which could still be wildly off base. Apologies if that is the case.

“FDR may have said he intended minimum wage to be a living wage, but that was only a speech meant for the people, so they think he will help. He was lying and never actually intended the minimum wage to be a living wage at all. Instead FDR wanted a minimum wage far lower than a living, thriving wage despite what he said”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Close enough

permalink
report
parent
reply

Conservative

!conservative@lemm.ee

Create post

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee’s rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don’t reply to it.

Community stats

  • 632

    Monthly active users

  • 406

    Posts

  • 2.8K

    Comments