feddit.org

0 points

1 year ago

you are most definitely exploiting animals in the scenario you described. do you think i need to build a water table in order to exploit it for a well?

report

[ - ]

rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee

0 points

1 year ago

Screw it, eating plants is animal abuse. Just photosynthesize

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

i didn’t say it’s abuse. i said it’s exploitation. everyone opposes abuse. exploitation is not inherently abusive.

report

[ - ]

Lowlee Kun@feddit.de

0 points

1 year ago

You are kidding yourself if you think what we do with animals is anything but abusive.

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

food, protection from predators, protection from the elemnts, and veterinary care is not abusive. i would describe it as “symbiotic”.

report

[ - ]

Lowlee Kun@feddit.de

0 points

1 year ago

You think any animal would choose this “safety” for beeing killed after a max of 1/10 of their lifespan? I wont even start about the living conditions most animals are in. For sea animals also nothing of your arguments holds true and we kill a fuckton of those.

You know its one thing to contribute to suffering because change is hard. Pretending this is something symbiotic is ridicoulus though.

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

Pretending this is something symbiotic is ridicoulus though.

this is literally an appeal to ridicule, not a refutation.

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

You think any animal would choose this “safety” for beeing killed after a max of 1/10 of their lifespan?

i don’t know of any animal killed at 1/10 of their lifespan.

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

You think any animal would choose this “safety” for beeing killed after a max of 1/10 of their lifespan?

i have yet to find proof that nonhuman animals understand personal mortality, so they wouldn’t even be able to understand the choice you are presenting.

report