You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-142 points

This is like calling a school bus driver a hero because at the last possible second he hit the brakes instead of intentionally driving the bus off a cliff.

It’s good he stepped aside, but he waited till pretty much the last second and clearly didn’t want to hit the brakes.

In that analogy, the heroes are all the people that got him to hit the brakes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

I didn’t call him a hero, though, I called him humble and good. In your zeal to urinate on corn flakes, you forgot basic reading skills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Good for being complicit in the Genocide of Palestinians?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good for stepping down for the sake of his country. Not good enough for certain internet pundits, but I think he’ll get over that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-63 points
*

If he’s “humble and good” he’d have stepped down a year ago so voters could have a real primary and not a coronation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Before doubling down, it might be wise to know what you are doubling down on. Aggressive foolishness is still foolishness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Lmao, since when the fuck was there a coronation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

That’s an interesting analogy because objectively the bus driver is a hero for stopping a bus full of kids hurtling off a cliff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s a poor analogy because there’s no one on the bus trying to grab the wheel and hit the gas by force.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This ain’t the movie Speed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

If he wasn’t the one flooring it headed right to the cliff…

And if he didn’t take months of people telling him to hit the brakes while he screamed back only “Lord God” can stop the bus

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

Absolutely nothing was stopping him from remaining in the race until the convention and becoming the official nominee. That was a viable path forward, if he had wanted to choose it. That he did not, deserves acknowledgement and respect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I agree in principle with what you’re saying.

However, a sitting president is not entitled to the nomination. It’s happened before where a sitting president is denied a nomination for a second term, and it’s been given to someone else in the party instead.

If it had gone that way with Biden though, I think the optics would have been so bad that there would be no hopes of salvaging the election though, so it’s still praiseworthy that he dropped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

He was not going to be the nominee due to being the sitting president. He was going to be the nominee due to defeating his main rival “uncommitted” in the primaries, along with Rep. Dean Philips and Marianne Williamson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

He could have shrugged it off like RBG did and fuck everyone for generations. Better late than never.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Better late than never.

Obviously.

But if a guy has a gun next to your head and ends up not pulling the trigger, are you gonna talk about how good your kidnapper was?

You still got kidnapped, and you still had a gun to your head.

Why thank the person who caused the problem and not the hostage negotiaters who got you released?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Maybe the timing was to ensure an albatross like JD was firmly tied around his neck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

So you think Biden and the DNC colluded and he always meant to stand down?

He just waited until there wasn’t enough time for a primary so Kamala could get it?

Don’t get me wrong, she’s got a better shot than Joe. But if you legitimately think they planned this timing…

That’s not a good look.

Especially for voters in NH who had their primary delegates stolen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Or he waited until the Trump campaign sunk millions of dollars into a strategy that has now been completely subverted and which they have no real way out of without a massive pivot like dropping Trump which isn’t going to happen. If that’s the case, I’d call it a pretty savvy move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I don’t think the timing was planned in advance.

But I think he was getting tired, probably had enough commitments for support to Kamala (he probably gave everybody who demanded he steps down an ultimatum, support her or he stays), and decided there wasn’t going to be a better time to do it. Seems like he was right

https://slrpnk.net/comment/10036679

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 190K

    Comments