You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
8 points

Banning bobafuttbucker because he posts when you won’t is a coward’s move. He’s the only one who pretends this is a legitimate community.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

Timeline of events, read before it gets deleted:

8 days ago:

  • @wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee posted a CNN article and I commented acknowledging that it seems the source is now allowed here.

2 Days ago:

  • I posted this article from Fox about Elon, which got removed citing R2 (not sure what about Fox or Elon is viewed as anti-conservative or not pro-conservative, but there ya go).

  • I then posted this article from CNN, which is a running ticker of election 2024 stories with no specific bias, which also got removed citing R2 even though I added a comment (in line with the other rules of this community)

  • I made a meta post with no intention besides getting some attention about this perceived double-standard:

  • I DM’d Wintermute to gain some clarity about why these posts were perceived to have violated R2, with no response other than a community ban.

I’m posting this because I honestly feel the reasons given were complete bullshit. If Wintermute can use CNN as a source, why can’t I? If Fox/Elon stories are not pro-conservative, what is?

The only explanations I can think of are that Wintermute is deleting posts and banning users because he’s overreacting to the article title and getting triggered thinking it’s somehow anti-conservative, and/or he’s just using a BS excuse to kick me out of this community.

I have reached out directly to Wintermute and other mods on this community multiple times requesting explanations so I may make better contributions to this community going forward. As you can see, they’re falling mainly on deaf ears.

Maybe I’m a little trolly sometimes and for that I’m truly sorry, but I really try to adhere to rules for posting because I know how restrictive the rules are and think having these discussions can be valuable for everyone. But even when I follow mod examples they still block/ban me.

How is that anything besides a double-standard?

How does this behavior contribute positively to a community?

How is this behavior classified as anything to rational people besides power-tripping?

Do what you want if you’re the Mod, but if that’s what you have to do to spin the narrative in your head, maybe you’re just wrong and should find inner peace in accepting that. If you really wanted a healthy community here you would welcome this information as a basis for further discussion into our respective views. It’s now painfully clear you don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points
*

CNN is allowed under R2 as long as it is pro-conservative or . Talking about Elon and his finances is not pro-conservative, nor is it anti-liberal. There are plenty of other places for you to talk about Elon. The topic isn’t relevant to the spirit of R2.

You also posted that Kamala Harris is not in line with R2.

I have had this conversation with you ad nauseam, and I will not repeat myself constantly. I will delete the offending material and go on with life.

I will repost rule 2 to allow you to read and digest it again.

We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

As you will note, CNN as a source of information is fine as long as it is pro-conservative. If you think one of the mods will delete it, it is best to post an explanation as to how it is pro-conservative or showing a liberal bias.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias

… according to wintermute. Maybe it’s not so clear to the rest of us where the boundaries lie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

@HunterOfGunners @wintermute_oregon I am confused as to what this means. He’s sort of a troll, but I’m a free speech stan and don’t think he necessarily deserves to be banned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Thank you @realcaseyrollins, genuinely.

We hardly ever get along but this is sweet of you and I truly appreciate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

He continuously posted articles in violation of r2. It’s a two day ban to discourage violating rule 2

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The echo chamber must remain intact after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Then you should either enforce it universally or remove the rule.

There’s a post that’s been up for hours that’s in clear violation. Why is that one ok but mine get removed in minutes?

If it’s a question of bandwidth then get more mods.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Conservative

!conservative@lemm.ee

Create post

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee’s rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don’t reply to it.

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 515

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments