There is a pull request which adds a new setting show_downvotes with these settings:

  • Show (current behaviour)
  • Hide (all downvotes hidden in ui)
  • ShowForOthers (only downvotes on other user’s posts are visible)

Importantly the last option would become the new default, which means that users wont be aware that their post or comment was downvoted unless they manually change the setting. This may be good for mental health, but may also make it harder for users to realize that their content is unpopular. What do you think about it?

Here is the pull request

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
5 points

You want to be more welcoming to the people who freak out about downvotes? The people for whom the slightest criticism is a huge problem?

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

You’re conflating downvotes with criticism. Also if there’s no downvotes you’re more inclined to comment (and criticize) because you can’t lazily downvote

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think downvotes are criticism/judgment - even if it’s more of a silent type (in lieu of actually replying, as you pointed out).

Even from the standpoint of “You should only use downvotes to indicate that a comment/post is off topic for the community” that Reddit originally tried to (naively IMO, you can’t enforce it not being a “I disagree” button, but I digress) have is still what I’d consider to be criticism. Mainly because regardless of the vote being cast as that vs a general “I disagree”, it’s still an indication of disapproval of the commenter.

Criticism of course comes in a lot of forms, and can vary on the “level” of it - I wouldn’t say that downvotes are a high level of criticism, but one nonetheless.

That’s just my view of it, at least, I can’t see how they wouldn’t be a form of criticism - you shouldn’t use them as a “This breaks the rules” indicator because that should be a report instead of a vote IMO, otherwise it’s far less likely to be acted upon/handled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve seen countless good comments downvoted on reddit and .world with no engagement whatsoever just because it didn’t fit passing lurkers worldview, but is otherwise factually correct. Forcing you to comment instead of downvote, let’s lurkers vote based on the content of the comment (obv this lays a burden on moderation, but is worth the tradeoff as it can foster really good discussions and higher understandong of the topic at hand)

Mainly because regardless of the vote being cast as that vs a general “I disagree”, it’s still an indication of disapproval of the commenter.

Here’s the disagreement: one is a disagreement that allows you to vent without challenging yourself, the other is a disagreement where you know what the disagreement is about

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“Criticism” has multiple meanings, and I believe the user you’re replying to is using one of the definitions which means more than just simple disagreement - obviously a downvote is expressing a negative judgement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I see two issues here:

  • more “dunking”
  • awful takes getting more attention
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The other side is:

  • it challenges you to formulate your disagreement
  • if the community holds awful takes they never get exposed to a differing opinion (although moderation can do that too)
  • there’s people out there that believe: more upvotes = more true and Formulate their opinions based on that
  • “dunking” and “ratio” only work if the content of the comment/criticism is valid. Otherwise its just showing your ass
permalink
report
parent
reply

Lemmy

!lemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

Community stats

  • 305

    Monthly active users

  • 413

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments

Community moderators