I get the message and agree but busty dragoness is not an art lol let’s be honest here. It’s a well crafted image
It never ceases to amaze me that nsfw goon creators think of themselves as artists
Just cause you don’t agree with it doesn’t make it not art. Art is anything created by an organic being that relays a mood or a message wether it be intentional or not.
Art is something that conveys some message and meaning. Gooning is just opposite
Cmon you surely realise that these nsfw furry commissioners cannot be called artists.
Is a brazzers porn director an artist? If your definition says he is then it is a wrong definition.
Organic being is also wrong btw. Sentient instead.
On the most basic level art is means of communication.
As you can see portrait of big tiddy dino waifu on porn site has no message nor communicates anything. There is no meaning to it. There could be but there isn’t. Though OP picture actually communicates something so it is an art in this example, meta art
Is a brazzers porn director an artist? If your definition says he is then it is a wrong definition.
Usually it’s not a very high standard but it is a standard, and even without getting into proper erotica and staying with pulp: Lemon stealing whores exist. Even Gonzo in itself is a choice, breaking through the traditional structure, opting to completely eradicate the fourth wall, the pretence. I bet it takes quite some skill to portray the fantasy of being a camera man on a porn set vs. the reality of it.
Art is not like enlightenment, it’s more like meditation. You don’t need to be good at it to be doing it.
On the most basic level art is means of communication.
Nope that’d be language (in whatever form). The core of art is intent. It’s the science of subjective choice, there’s no requirement to be intersubjective. It can be just you and the medium, and that medium can even be yourself, c.f. ars vivendi. Plenty of philosophers are artists.
