Comment by aodhsishaj@lemmy.world on Let's blame the dev who pressed "Deploy"

Git Blame exists for a reason, and that’s to find the engineer who pushed the bad commit so everyone can work together to fix it.

Blame the Project manager/Middle manager/C-Level exec/Unaware CEO/Greedy Shareholders who allowed for a CI/CD process that doesn’t allow ample time to test and validate changes.

Software needs a union. This shit is getting out of control.

Casual hard R slur in chat

Edit who the fuck is downvoting me and therefore defending using a slur?

Apparently a snowflake deleted my comment too lol

I’m going to guess it was a libertarian who took exception to my calling them out hahaha

Snowflake? Why are mentally disabled folks ok to make fun of? They didn’t pick it or do it, and it has nothing to do with good or bad politics.

Make fun of things people choose to do. Not shit they were born with.

Definition of removed- a person affected with intellectual disability

I stand by what I said. Sorry I ruffled your jimmies. Not sorry I used the word. You imply my insulting mentally disabled people. I’m not.

You are. It’s a slur. It is not an accepted term in the medical community.

Edit here’s an actual definition from https://www.merriam-webster.com:

dated, now offensive : affected by intellectual disability : INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED NOTE: The term <r> is increasingly considered offensive. The use of intellectually disabled is now preferred over <r> in medical, educational, and regulatory contexts, as well as in general use.

Further, you use it as an insult specifically in that you suggest someone of a certain political preference is intellectually disabled.

Essentially you are combining someone’s medical situation they did not pick or cause, with someone else’s political interests. That’s fucked up.

Edit this is like if you used the n word then finished a comment saying “I’m not insulting anyone. I’m using it my own way”. You don’t get to do that, that’s not how slurs work.

Unions often create barriers to new people entering a field and driving wages down. This is an issue for many devs, like me, because I don’t have a degree, I’m self taught and freelance- I’m worried I’d be forced out of the field or into more formal employment by licensing or other requirements. Neither of which I want.

Yeah every time I’ve ever looked into it there’s always someone talking about “protecting the field from amateurs”. And usually that means protecting the field from people who don’t have a degree.

I actually do have a degree but it’s in forensics. I just let them fill the blank in for themselves and let them think it’s digital forensics.

Yeah every time I’ve ever looked into it there’s always someone talking about “protecting the field from amateurs”.

Which I really don’t get, because to my knowledge no disproportionate amount of problems has been caused by self-taught devs.

It really feels more like either elitism or wanting to protect wages.

Or it needs to be a profession.

Licensed professional engineers are expected to push back on requests that endanger the public and face legal liability if they don’t. Software has hit the point where failure is causing the economic damage of a bridge collapsing.

Sounds like the kind of oversight that tends to come with a union and the representation therein.

Lol, sadly not. Most professions do not have unions and representation, such that it is, falls mostly to the accreditation group.

Software engineering is too wide and deep for licensing to be feasible without a degree program- which would be a massive slap in the face to the millions of skilled self taught devs.

Some states let some people get professional licensure through experience alone. It just ends up taking more than a decade of experience to meet the equivalent requirements of a four year degree.

Yeaaa that’s not exactly a solution

Why not? It is still valuing the self education of people. It just means having a license to manage the system requires people with significant experience.

And it isn’t like a degree alone is required for licensure.

Because a decade of professional experience is a long time, and doesn’t value independent experience. I’ve been coding for over 11 years, but professionally only a couple. Also software development is very international, how would that even be managed when working with self-taught people across continents?

I agree developers should be responsible, but licensing isn’t it, when there are 16 year olds that are better devs than master’s graduates.

And in the cases of healthcare and emergency dispatch, loss of life as well.

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Let's blame the dev who pressed "Deploy"(yieldcode.blog)

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Our Rules

Approved Bots

Community stats

Community moderators