Of course, continuing this research I believe is important. Still, I don’t like the framing of this article. It seems to me like it says something like conspiracies vs science. In reality there are plenty of valid concerns and criticism that come from within the scientific community, and only a few are mentioned in this article and very briefly.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
4.5K
Monthly active users
2.5K
Posts
8.9K
Comments
