You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
46 points

So, now we get to see how many “blue no matter who”’s actually meant it.

Remember folks, it applies to anyone who might be the candidate.

That over…. Harris/AOC or Harris Whitmer !!

permalink
report
reply
17 points

You think people are lying about that? Weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

“I Know you don’t like MY candidate, but you know… Blue No Matter WHO!!! You don’t want a fascist to win, do you?”

people are absolutely lying about it. the question is… how many.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You’ve not convinced me. I don’t know why anyone would use that argument if it completely betrayed their feelings. Plenty others you could use which make more sense

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

If the blue pick is a broken toaster oven, I’m still voting for it rather than tump

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’d vote for a battered cardboad cutout of Reagan over Trump. Hell. I’d vote for a cardboard cut out of trump over trump.

(cardboard cut outs can’t talk.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A ficus. Like in 2000

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Kamala all the way! It won’t be AOC or Whitmer though. Most likely Kelly or Newsom. AOC is the future, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Newsome cannot and will not be the VP. Harris is also from California, which would cause issues in the electoral college. Electors cannot cast both the Presidential and vice-presidential ballot for someone from the same state as themselves. Because both Harris and Newsome are form California, it could cause issues, and they might not get the electoral votes from California.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

so what debate one-liners are you putting on your bingo card?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“Lock him up!” <-- If she doesn’t fucking say this so help me god…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I doubt Newsome, you wouldn’t want both from California

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Very good point! Kelly then? That’s my top pick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If the ticket is something messed up like Harris/Bob Menendez, or Harris/Blagoyavich, I might have some reservations, but would quickly look past them considering the alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Only problem I have with menendez is that I’m too broke to buy him off.

(I suspect the people who don’t have a problem with him… are rich enough. Funny how that works.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I think AOC isn’t old enough to be VP. I don’t say that as a matter of opinion. I think you have to be at least 40

Edit: it’s actually 35, but AOC is 34 so I was partially correct

However I think the relevant language is:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

So maybe it’s okay for VP

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

AOC’s birthday is this October, so I believe she would be eligible just in time lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She’ll be old enough to be POTUS by inauguration.

So, she’s probably old enough to be VPOTUS…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Irrelevant. The Democrats would never put a progressive in a position where they could be president. They’ll probably go for a centrist like Shapiro or a corporate Dem like Newsom. I’m hoping that they’ll go with Whitmer but they’ll probably shy away from a two woman ticket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Before I left home this morning, I pointed to the bottle of mustard on the table and told my girl that I would vote for the mustard. We were talking about the rumors of Biden dropping out.

At least the mustard is honest about its color. So are carrots, for that matter. I’d totally vote for a carrot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Turnips too.

What kinda carrot? Chatennay or Danvers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yup, I’ll vote for any garden vegetable except for cucumbers and their squash and watermelon relatives. Will make an exception for pickles, they’re one of the good ones.

Don’t know much about carrot varieties other than Queen Anne’s lace is a wild carrot. Know more about taters and tomatoes.

Figure any real carrot would do. I’d totally vote for a beefsteak or better boy tomato over a carrot, however.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or Harris Wittels, best of both worlds, AND the afterlife.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We also get to see how many of the anti-Biden kids will actually vote now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

As much as I’d love to see it in my lifetime, no way she chooses a female VP. Way too risky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Did you vote for H Clinton, though? I bet not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What gives you the idea I didn’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 121K

    Comments