You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

Kamala has a similar approval rating to Biden. If he wasn’t viable, neither is she.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Biden wasn’t viable because he has cognitive decline. Kamala will mop the floor with Trump in debates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

I would not be at all surprised if Trump refuses to debate her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I think I remember reading an earlier analysis that says that Trump has no reason to accept debates with any potential new candidate, as it just gives them more visibility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Absolutely. They had no reason to debate Biden again. They sure as shit won’t put him on stage against her, or ANY other candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Trump will visibly age on stage like Palpatine from the absolute roasting Harris would do to him

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Charitable to think that Trump would agree to a debate with Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why wouldn’t he? Is he to old and scared to cope?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Both candidates are experiencing decline, and if Biden were elected and incapable of doing the job it would have resulted in a Harris Presidency anyway. It’s such an odd thing to object over. We’ve had presidents in decline before and the country kept running just fine, (FDR, Reagan.)

Biden did a fine job in office, I’m especially proud of his union support, and his policies were spot on in my opinion. To throw him under the bus like this seems really shitty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Biden made the right decision for the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you think debates are really going to sway voters at this point? Like the people considering Trump don’t already know what a blowhard he is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Debates can energize the voter base which is what we need right now. And who knows, the debates might even convince some people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

People don’t know much about Kamala yet. That will now change very dramatically. Biden had hit his ceiling, a known quantity that everyone already knew very well. Harris has room to climb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s something I think some people just missed when Biden dropping out was debated. Of course, the other potential picks were polling behind him at that point. But he was showing clear signs that he had peaked, and would only be able to fight not to drop further. His most powerful argument had been not being Trump - which any candidate can wield. And any candidate with charisma and the ability to speak, debate and campaign has a lot of room to move up, whereas Biden was fighting not to move down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

To be fair, most people really don’t know much about her yet. She’s mostly stayed in the shadows as a VP. That could change, for better or worse, when they know her better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is a hilarious misreading of polling data. Kamala may not win, but her percentage chance to win might be double or more of what Bidens was.

People I follow were estimating Biden at 10-15% by the time the election rolled around. All the models assume that a candidate would run a normal campaign. Something that he is not capable of doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The argument that I’ve seen made is that her approval rating will rise if she becomes the candidate.

I’m not sure how realistic that is, but it’s the one that was made.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 119K

    Comments