feddit.org

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-03-23/state-farm-wont-renew-72-000-insurance-policies-in-california-worsening-the-states-insurance-crisis

25 points

3 months ago

Ah yes, insurance against fire. I can’t see a problem ever happening there.

Wait, that’s already a problem?

So if I get this right, your solution is to do something insurance companies aren’t willing to do.

Should they be forced to?

report

[ - ]

rottingleaf@lemmy.world

-19 points

3 months ago

No, it’s not, the article is obviously not in ancap context, it’s in USA, California, 2024 context.

Humanity is doomed.

report

[ - ]

Socsa@sh.itjust.works

5 points

3 months ago

I’m starting to think this person isn’t just trolling…

report

[ - ]

19 points

3 months ago

What would make insuring such homes profitable in your world?

report

[ - ]

rottingleaf@lemmy.world

-24 points

3 months ago

An irrelevant question after your argument has been shot down

report

[ - ]

19 points

3 months ago

You didn’t shoot down my argument. You just said “nuh-uh.”

report

[ - ]

rottingleaf@lemmy.world

-19 points

3 months ago

Your argument is in the wrong context -> it’s invalid -> shot down.

You’re simply denying things you don’t like and pretend to be winning something somewhere. Go away

report

[ - ]

17 points

3 months ago

You said insurance would cover firefighting.

I’m saying insurance can’t afford to do that now.

Your response to that is “the ancap world isn’t like the world now.”

Yes, I know. So what’s the difference?

report

prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works

Show more comments

[ - ]

8 points

3 months ago

Everyone this is sophism in action

report

explodicle@sh.itjust.works

Show more comments

[ - ]

2 points

3 months ago

Adding to the pile of stupid questions:

Why don’t the insurance companies just offer it at a higher rate, until it’s profitable for them?

report