You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
37 points

Does this mean upcoming distros can have the drivers inbuilt? NVIDIA Cards working out of the box? I’m Out of the Loop.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

This has never been an issue. Nothing stops any distro from installing the DKMS drivers at install time. You also have the nouveau driver that can be installed by default if you don’t want to ask users to agree to Nvidia’s license for proprietary driver use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You also have the nouveau driver that can be installed by default…

And pretty soon, NVK!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

NVK is already usable, performancr isn’t 100% of the proprietary driver but I play Overwatch on NVK at 165FPS on my RTX3070 laptop a lot, low settings but very playable. This is with an Optimus configuration (VRR Freesync panel on AMD iGPU) in GNOME Wayland.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Wasn’t nova the new driver?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But apparently people always had issues with NVidia graphics cards on Linux, no matter what driver it is. And the fact that even Mint and Ubuntu don’t install the drivers by default tells that there indeed are some legal issues with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What kind of issues do they have? I’ve used gtx970, 1080, rtx3080 and now 3090 and I’ve never had any issues worth mentioning.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ubuntu is also stale old software, and shouldn’t be a distro anyone wanting a functional box running new hardware/software should use. Valve realized this and moved SteamOS to Arch so they would have a current stack not constantly 6+ months behind upstream, needing to backport everything to an outdated stack.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So, it’s just the philosophy of FOSS stopping distros from using proprietary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m not sure what distro you’ve used that was unable to install Nvidia drivers as part of the general OS install process, but it would have been due to needing the user to agree to the proprietary driver’s EULA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Well, what I really wonder is if because the kernel can include it, if this will make an install more agnostic. Like literally pull my disk out of a gaming nvidia machine, and plug it into my AMD machine with full working graphics. If so this is good for me since I use a usb-c nvme ssd for my os to boot from on my work and home machines and laptops for when I’m not worrying. All three currently have nvidia cards and this works ok. I have some games to chill and take a break. My works core OS for work MDM etc unmodified. I like it that way.

I realise this is not a terribly useful case, but I could see it for graphically optimised VM migrations too not that I have many. Less work in transitioning gives greater flexibility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

this works ok

People said that the new 555 Nvidia drivers works good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like literally pull my disk out of a gaming nvidia machine, and plug it into my AMD machine with full working graphics.

This should work already, i switched from nvidia to amd this year by swapping the cards and removing the nvidia drivers some time later.

I guess it’s because the drivers only apply to their specific hardware, so no problems having amd and nvidia drivers present at the same time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The kernel drivers were never an issue, but userspace drivers fixed this many years ago with glvnd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@jokro @biscuitswalrus Yanked out my 3060TI and replaced it with a Intel A770 16gb “special” edition and gaming on a 49" odessey on linux has never been better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Pop OS exists my dude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t understand, If Pop OS, Nobara, Bazzite can, why not all distros? Is it a philosophical reason to not include proprietary drivers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In the case of Debian I think it is philosophical. It’s been years since I’ve had to install proprietary things on Debian, but they used to be all in the non-free repository that you had to add manually. Honestly I like it, it reminds me I’m putting proprietary crap in the machine. Can be a pain in the ass when the wifi doesn’t work because some proprietary firmware is missing, and the laptop doesn’t have an Ethernet port so off you go to buy a usb-eth adaptor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Fedora does not because they can’t support it. If a bug is found all they can do is shrug and point you at Nvidia. If they want to add a feature that breaks they would be stuck and have to hold back other drivers.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 9.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 37K

    Comments