WHAT

  • Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump was shot at a rally in PA.

TRUMPS STATEMENT

“I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania. Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured. It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead. I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW SO FAR

  • gunman is dead
  • Trump “is fine”
  • one attendee is dead
  • another attendee is in critical condition

News Sources

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
264 points

A reminder, he incited people Jan 6th which resulted in deaths.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

And instead we got a guarantee of actual fascism in America. This was a stupid, selfish move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The comment in question was removed for celebrating and advocating violence, which violates lemmy.world Server Terms of Service

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

That’s the wild thing.

This is a “Oh no what will Cheeto say to start a riot?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

And his cult still defends the insurrectionists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unless it’s more convenient to call them Antifa.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Or all the domestic violence

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

This shit was never here before because it’s likely CYA mode for Lemmy because feds could come sniffing here if copycat incidents occur.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

bro the feds are already sniffing lemmy you think they arent?

They’re sniffing lemmy just like their sniffing literally every other social media platform right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Is it not actually called the fed…averse…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There is a difference between background-level bulk sniffing and someone-here-maybe-incited-violence targeted sniffing. The former is data collection, which is passive in the form practiced by “the feds”. The latter is data connection, putting effort into connecting a subset of the data that has been collected to form a story. Data connections need a framing, a nucleation seed, an impetus for why the feds might think such a connection is interesting or relevant or worth adding to their story about a larger incident. Collecting data is cheap and done in bulk, partly because it can be done passively and partly because the US govt paid a lot of money on storage and collection mechanisms. Connecting data is something that requires a lot more time, effort, patience, and vetting to make sure you are doing it right.

Or you can give the job to generative AI and hope it doesn’t hallucinate that someone innocent is guilty; with a large enough data pool (ie the internet, reality, what-have-you) it’s possible to select a misleading subset to support whatever hallucination you want.

It’s easy to do wrong, which is exactly why you don’t want the feds sniffing around. Especially now that they have the tools to automate doing it wrong, and might not know how to use them yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Two wrongs do not make a right though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

But 3 rights make a left

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

But 1 click on a windage knob would have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is funnier retrospectively because apparently this fucking dumbass wasn’t even using an optic. insanity

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ehhhh

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

That’s not a justification for more violence, two wrongs don’t make a right. He was wrong for doing what he did and this is wrong as well. This is because political violence in it’s entirety is wrong. Jesus, do people not have principles anymore? Seeing all the supposedly moral people turn into Q anon level conspiracy theorists who condone violence is depressing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points
*

two wrongs don’t make a right.

You’re right. But let me tell you all about the sympathy I have for him:

.

That’s about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Let us take this as a reminder for everyone concerned with their own safety in a fascist state.

Guns wont do shit for you unless you regularly practice your marksmanship and keep your equipment in good condition.

A fascist exercised and practiced marksmanship today, did you, dear reader?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That’s when you say I will happily read their obituary

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I don’t have any sympathy for him either, but that’s still not a reason to abandon my principles and start cheering for political violence

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The death of Hitler, sadam hussein, Bin laden and all the others who threatened the free world disagree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But these are vastly different situations. For the record, all three of these individuals used political violence to achieve political aims, that’s one of the reasons why history doesn’t remember them fondly. The constantly killed people they didn’t like under the justification that it’s for the greater good or self defense. Saddam Hussien did that when he genocided the Kurds in Iraq and the invasion Kuwait, Hitler did that with the Holocaust and the invasion of Europe, and Bin Laden did that with 9/11 and the other terrorist attacks he launched.

Keep in mind, we actually have a justice system in this country that actually works. If we want Trump to face justice it has to go through the justice where he faces trial and is found guilty based on evidence… which has already happened btw for one of his crimes. That’s how justice is handled in a civil democracy. We can’t have randos going on self righteous terrorism crusades killing political candidates they don’t like. If someone tried assassinate Biden, would you being say the same? Probably not, and rightfully so, but the terrorist who tried to kill would be making similar justifications to what you’re trying to make right now. The very idea is wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Hitler committted suicide. Any insight in how the other executions actually improved the world?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

free world

lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Tell me, should we have turned the other cheek during WWII? Two wrongs don’t make a right after all, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

technically two negatives multiplied does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We didn’t join WWII because the Nazis were bad, we joined because Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and then Hitler declared war on the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I didn’t say it was. You just put those words in my mouth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So you’re telling me conservatives will realize this has gone to far and tell everyone to remain calm and peaceful?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The reasonable conservatives have already jumped off ship a long time ago and are now mostly either apolitical, independent, disenfranchised Democrat, or still a minority Republican opposing Trump. The only ones left that support Trump are his cult, and they will never see reason. However, we can’t get rid them with violence. It’s like what America tried to do with the Taliban or Israel is trying to do now with Hamas or what Saudi Arabia has tried to do with the Houthis, you can’t use violence to get rid of ideologies. The way to get rid of ideologies is to make them irrelevant. This can happen either by defeating them in democratic elections or using their track records to delegitimatize them or ignoring them or providing better alternatives or whatever. Political violence will only fuel them, and that is something I don’t want to see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

A wrong makes a right if it prevents many many horrible wrongs in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The ends don’t justify the means politics, that’s how you end up with terrorism, tyrannical governments, and atrocities. I’m all for bringing Trump to justice, but it has be done through civil and democratic means via the established criminal justice system. If Trump goes through trial and is found guilty, which has already happened for one of his crimes, then our criminal justice system will punish him accordingly. If the punishments aren’t deemed harsh enough then we reform our punitive laws. We can’t have self righteous assholes going on terrorism crusades assassinating political candidates they don’t like. That’s a sign of a failed state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Mhmm. Where exactly do you draw the line regarding use of force as a preventative measure?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

When it’s used as a means to achieve power in a democracy. Normalizing violence is not okay in general, but especially during democratic elections, and this applies to everybody regardless of who does it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

one wrong plus another wrong, generally seems to overthrow most rights throughout the history of man kind.

I’m not sure what to do with this information, but it’s present.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If by rights you mean you human rights then normalized widespread violence tends to do that, that’s the whole reason why tyranny isn’t exactly good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Ikr!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-69 points

How many deaths did it result in? Cause there is only one death on Jan 6 that has ever been attributed to Jan 6.

I don’t disagree that he incited the insurrection, but making false claims doesn’t help show that the left is the party of honesty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Why are you pretending like right-wing violence isn’t the literal leading domestic security threat?

Have you been living under a rock since 2016?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

2016? It’s been since at least the 90s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

The left, who? What party?

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/11/how-many-died-as-a-result-of-capitol-riot/

Babbitt plus suicides, and other “natural” deaths.

On March 7, the District of Columbia’s Police and Firefighters’ Retirement and Relief Board declared that Metropolitan Police Officer Jeffrey Smith’s suicide in the days after the Jan. 6 riot was a line-of-duty death. The board concluded “that Officer Smith sustained a personal injury on January 6, 2021, while performing his duties and that his injury was the sole and direct cause of his death.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The left isn’t even a party, genius.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hey numbnuts, America doesn’t have a left and it’s the MAGA fascists that are the problem here

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.3K

    Posts

  • 148K

    Comments