Looks like someone took some shots at prez candidate Donald Trump at a rally in PA. From the videos I’ve seen, it looks like he did get grazed.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
173 points

Half the comments here are proving that people on the right aren’t the only ones who can indulge in stupid conspiracy theories.

It’s depressing as fuck.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Q-Anon level thinking that somehow Trump is a mastermind of this. The dude who can’t hide stolen files properly, can’t lie on his taxes properly, and loses money on a casino, somehow has the ability to rig a false flag assassination attempt.

Are NeoLibs that so far into the Kool-Aid that Dipshit Trump is also a grandmaster 5D chess player of this, while not being able to string words together? It’s not like he’s even been a good actor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Trump isn’t even the mastermind of his own bowel movements. If this was staged it was all planned by his Russian handlers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Roger Stone would be my guess.

Edit:

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I am glad Russia has no experience whatsoever with this type of operations

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It’s fun to indulge in, and it doesn’t change the fact that shit is about to hit the fan, regardless of whether the shooter was someone with a legitimate desire or a paid gunman. Trump was just given and used a golden ticket to both rally republicans to vote for him, and to incite his diehard followers into another insurrection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Sure, but I don’t think being an ironic conspiracy theorist on the levels of Q-Anon is going to make anyone seem better.

Trump was already going to do that. Trump would do it if someone sneezed on him. They already considered him a martyr. They already wanted/have an Enabling Act. The only thing this changes is a bit less blood in him, and 3 people died. Trump already had higher polling numbers.

Fascism is here. Get ready.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah there are some real idiots in this thread. Very depressing

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s representative of the current state of this country honestly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A “false flag assassination attempt” is not as hard to rig if you know it won’t be properly investigated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It doesn’t take a mastermind. Dictators faking assassination attempts to garner support isn’t new.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“All right ear me big sniper guy, it’s going to be an attempted assassination, the biggest ever, you are going to shoot me close, like danger close but don’t worry I’m the best president, really I’m the best and you are the best sniper, the best sniper in the whole country. So you shoot me near the ear, near enough that blood comes out, I know scary stuff, but we are tough guys, the toughest so you do it and I resist and together we make the best attempted staged assassination ever”

  • Shamelessly stolen from a blog
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Neoliberals are pro-trump, plan 2025 calls for going after people with student loans

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

What I find sad is that either option is equally plausible. That’s how low we have sunk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

0.01% chance based on what?

I think being unsure either way makes perfect sense. You gotta admit it doesn’t really line up with Trump’s character to be posing for the cameras if he’s actually being shot at. Though tou’re not wrong to say, that that isn’t proof of anything. It’s subjective feeling.

But, I think saying it’s entirely unlikely this was orchestrated isn’t right either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I wonder what the chances are that Russia did this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

The shooter was killed by Secret Service.

Very convenient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I don’t disagree with you, but you completely missed my point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

On this topic as a whole, it’s also proving people on the left are in favor of gun violence…

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Not like it really needs proving. When Marx writes about “revolution,” he means bloody, violent revolution.

Anyone advocating revolution needs guns to back it up or else they’re just full of hot air.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Elections were meant to be bloodless revolutions. Unfortunately with First Past The Post voting, the right options were not available to vote for. But we can change how we vote. We can make peaceful revolution possible with a more representative electoral system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Antifascists have a long history of shooting Natzi.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not every time at all. Franco, Salazar, and Pinochet were not defeated via guns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

And how! I love the irony tho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was thinking the same thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

How do you know their political leanings?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

What’s worse is that the MAGA crowd has Trump and some other figures intentionally playing conspiracies up and adding weight to them. The guys on the left don’t even have the excuse of Biden and company bullshitting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Braindead comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

But why would you even think that people on the left are different from people on the right? This is why I’m not into politics myself. Because it all builds on some fake idea that one side is right about everything, even good people, while the other is wrong about everything, and probably are bad people as well.

In reality, both sides are very similar and have much more incommon with eachother than they have with the politicians they are trying to support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Just quid pro quo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-41 points

That’s blue maga for ya.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

“blue maga” implies that there is a cult of personality around Biden like there is around Trump. That is simple not what anyone opposed to Trump believes in or rallies around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

BlUe MaGa!!1!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Based on what? Neither of you know who they support or which way they lean.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 199K

    Comments