You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

You honestly think that factory farm emissions font change if people don’t give them money for their product? If your head was any further down in the sand, the magma would melt it.

Analogies don’t indicate a similar level of morality. They are used to explain points to people who, for some reason, are unwilling or unable to otherwise understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You honestly think that factory farm emissions font change if people don’t give them money for their product?

have you tried that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, I have. The millions of us who choose not to help those assholes causes them to make less e missions. Unfortunately there are still people like you who live without caring about anyone but their own immediate gratification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

causes them to make less e missions.

that has never happened

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes, I have. The millions of us who choose not to help those assholes cause them to make less emissions. Unfortunately, there are still people like you who live without caring about anyone but their own immediate gratification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If your head was any further down in the sand, the magma would melt it.

this is a thought terminating cliche

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Analogies don’t indicate a similar level of morality.

i didnt suggest they did. i’m saying that buying food is disanalagous to rape.

edit

to be clear, rape is wrong. buying food is not. you don’t not-rape in order to reduce rape. you don’t-rape because rape is wrong. by contrast, the goal of not-buying meat is to reduce the environmental impact of the meat industry. if that doesn’t work, then not-buying meat is not a moral duty (at least, not for that reason. it’s possible there is some other reason, but that’s not the topic being discussed).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What if you buy food from someone you know murdered children to get it? It’s so obviously wrong that buying food is never an immoral act. If you are interested in having philosophical conversations, then you really need to go back to the basics. At this point, you’re trying to join an archery competition with a nurf toy. There are undeniably immoral ways to get food. Destroying the planet and torturing animals for slightly cheaper food that you do not absolutely need to survive is absolutely immoral. The reason it is so hard for you to see this is because you are an addict making excuses. Not because you are starving and need the cheapest, most despicable food.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s so obviously wrong that buying food is never an immoral act.

I allowed that there may be some reason buying some food might be immoral.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

no one is torturing animals

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

why is the bar “absolute need for survival”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

you accusation of addiction is a personal attack. it has no bearing on the truth of any of the claims I’ve made.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 132K

    Comments