You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-9 points

Seems like a lot of effort spent maligning a group of people to the left of the problem population.

permalink
report
reply
20 points
-7 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

First sentence from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism :

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, the right to private property and equality before the law.

Second paragraph from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_property :

Private property is foundational to capitalism, an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. As a legal concept, private property is defined and enforced by a country’s political system.

This is in stark contrast to the first sentence from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism :

Socialism is an economic and political philosophy encompassing diverse economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production, as opposed to private ownership.

What you call “liberal” and what you call “conservative” are both liberal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

You’re quite literally arguing that liberalism isn’t liberalism because conservatism/neoliberalism exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That’s not how things work. It doesn’t matter whether there is something worse out there or not. Each ideology has to be judged on its own terms. What you’re suggesting is a logical fallacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

So is red lemmy just a porn instance like redtube or why pick red when you’re not even slightly left wing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Liberals are definitely part of the problem population

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Liberals aren’t leftists

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Liberalism, at its core, is an ideology of emancipation that historically sought to dismantle oppressive hierarchies and champion freedom and equality for all. In practice, it continues to challenge modern systems of oppression, such as capitalism and systemic inequality, that restrict freedom for the many while empowering the privileged few. Although the language of liberalism has been co-opted by capitalist ideologies to justify hierarchies of wealth and power, its true essence lies in prioritizing universal liberty and rejecting systems of exploitation. By aligning more closely with leftist principles, which work toward creating a more equitable and just society.

Nobody is free until everyone is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

If I were more conspiracy-minded, I’d say they were purposely being counterproductive and driving away the only people who could conceivably be converted to their cause.

In reality, some people are just assholes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

hello blueAnon

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m utterly confused: how do you define “liberal”, and why do you think “they” are trying to drive “them” away by criticizing liberalism as a whole?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Socialism

!socialism@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules TBD.

Community stats

  • 963

    Monthly active users

  • 271

    Posts

  • 859

    Comments

Community moderators