Body camera footage shows the moment an LMPD officer hands a woman in labor a citation for unlawful camping as she waits for an ambulance.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-191 points

People really have no idea the meaning their words convey.

It’s not proof, it’s a sample size of 1 and I’d say it’s much more a display of delusion and hate than ‘cognitive damage’.

You think you’re helping, but you aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If this was the first and only time it happened I’d agree with you. But it isn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Found the bastard cop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Good try, better luck next time

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

it’s a sample size of 1

Whoo! That was a good one. wipes tears of laughter

We should be so lucky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

A lack of empathy can legitimately be viewed as “cognitive damage”. And this is by no means an isolated case. Not even remotely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Good comment - I think I’d disagree though. A lack of empathy can certainly be caused by cognitive damage but I don’t think it IS cognitive damage. I could be wrong though.

It’s not an isolated case, no, but this video and comment thread is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No it’s not an isolated case, but that comment is directly about this isolated case, stating it’s proof against an entire profession.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

For someone claiming to know words so well you’ve never heard of hyperbole?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

the fact it happened and she wasn’t helped instead shows you all you need to know. cops are dog shit. fuck them all, unempathetic ass hole bullies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Agreed. Call it what you will, but this is not “cognitive damage”. These pigs aren’t retarded, they’re doing shit like this on purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fucking thank you, someone who can see past emotion and use basic logic. The world needs more people like you

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah, thousands of individual instances, definitely not a pattern of systemic cruelty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Thousands of individual instances of pregnant women in labour being cited?

Again, words matter kiddies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

and every other cop on that force will back this asshole to the blue.

ACAB doesn’t mean that every cop is running around raping and extorting sex from everyone; or that they’re all running around killing black kids. ACAB does mean that the ones who are “good” are also protecting the ones who are bad rather than arresting them and treating their fellow cops as they would any one else.

if you show me a cop who isn’t, I’ll show you a cop whose not been on the job long enough to find out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You start - show me the cop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

if you show me a cop who isn’t, I’ll show you a cop whose not been on the job long enough to find out.

So MCAB or AACAB?

(Most / Almost All)

Was just discussing in another thread, referenced the Sith dealing in absolutes instead of using a phrase like “Policing Enables Bastards” in an attempt to be more accurate and harder to dismiss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Nope. Cops know what they are pretty quick. It’s practically impossible to last more than a week or two without becoming a bastard.

The blue wall is real, and they don’t allow people who might break rank stick around.

Corruption in police is an everyday occurrence and you either chose to ignore it or not be a cop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Nah bruh you the one not helping if you trying to provide apologetics for this kind of behavior. It deserves no charity, and making the argument it does means you are the bad guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Nah bruh, you don’t get it. You’re bootlicking the antibootlickers. I’ve got no horse in the race, I’m just talking logic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m just talking logic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

It’s okay to let people be angry about things that should enrage everyone with a pulse. Their sentiment is 100% accurate even if their words aren’t perfectly precise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s not perfect precision I’m suggesting. A modicum of reality and logic is all, because by ‘being angry’ and making outlandish claims like that, it hurts the whole movement.

It’s essentially ‘Trumpism’, just say whatever you want about people you don’t like and present it as fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 212K

    Comments