You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points
*

My understanding as well. Then there is this quote

“if a user has both a passkey and a password, and both grant access to an account, the account is still at risk for phishing. (…)"

How does a PIN, which is inferior to a password, provide more security, when passwords alledgedly aren’t secure anymore?

This is an obvious grab for biometric data if you ask me. The statements are too contradictory. At some point PINs are gonna get phased out as well. A bit like what they’re doing with local accounts on Win11

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

good thing biometric scanners can also be duped easily, unless it is some advanced stuff you won’t find in consumer devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You do not use the PIN to log into your account, but to unlock the passkey that is used to log into your account.

A PIN + the need to physically access a device capable of logging into your acount is safer than a password, which is safer than a PIN.

On the other hand, a compulsory 2FA bound to a physical device will create lots of problems when you loose access to your device.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technik

!technik@feddit.org

Create post

die Community für alles, was man als Technik beschreiben kann

Beiträge auf Deutsch oder Englisch

Community stats

  • 919

    Monthly active users

  • 833

    Posts

  • 1.1K

    Comments