There was an opportunity to do that a little over a month ago. But because Democrats didn’t put up the god-perfect candidate, voters opted for the dictator, then complained when he started acting like a dictator.
No one asked for god-perfect, they asked for not shit and who cared about their concerns.
Sadly the DNC decided they know what’s best for everyone and threw the election.
Yup, obviously they should have realised that Drump was a fine candidate whose personal charm, decorum and honestly would overwhelm any other candidate.
</S> obviously
No response to "Democrats ran a shit candidate who didn’t even mention healthcare or taxing the rich, and never won a primary " involves the words ‘Trump’, ‘putin’, ‘nazi’, or ‘republicans’.
Donald Trump isn’t the problem. The problem isnt that donald trump is so attractive or that the voters are so stupid. That’s like blaming fire for drawing an audience or being mad that ice is slippery.
The problem is that Democrats don’t want to win if it means a progressive agenda. The function of the Democratic party is to mollify progressives and help ratchet us to the right by providing a fig leaf for the same owner class that does almost all the donating to politics and is literally driving the legislative and judicial agenda of the GOP.
Well the important thing here is that you learned your party needs to run better candidates if they want to win. I certainly hope we learned our lesson.
Well the important thing here is that you learned your party needs to run better candidates if they want to win
The saddest part of it is people who keep dredging up this inane reasoning understand neither the irony or stupidity involved in it.
Well the important thing here is that you learned your party needs to run better candidates if they want to win.
Well if its not your party why would we want your advice? It sounds like you are someone who has set themselves up to be a lifetime loser in politics who will never win and has never won.
