You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
7 points

The problem it can’t solve is that rich people might have to interact with mere humans.

I can relate. We, in Indonesia, have a problem where politicians, whose never even ride a train before, gets to decide the policies about public transport, and those who gets the consequenece is low-middle class who uses public transport. There was a meme from a year ago where a tone-deaf politician says the overcrowded trains in Jakarta doesn’t exist even though it overcrowding is clearly a problem in regional line (KRL) due to lack of trains.

I wonder if rail would be more appealing to them if the coaches were designed as multiple isolated cells that seated 4-6, rather than straight-through corridors that permit mingling.

Assuming we’re talking about short distance trains, absolutely no, lol. It’s just space inefficient. I will understand if it is a long distance trains, and it is a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Short-distance city trains used to have multiple compartments too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_Door_(train) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_(train)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Things like the “C-Trains” in Calgary, despite being intended for mass transit (and ridden mainly by the poors) are also multi-compartment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I assumed the parent commenter meant this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartment_coach

But if the commenter meant cross-seat trains like this:

then yeah it exists

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes… it’s the first one? Did you not look at the links I shared?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Public Transport

!publictransport@slrpnk.net

Create post

Everything about public transportation!

Community stats

  • 331

    Monthly active users

  • 17

    Posts

  • 75

    Comments

Community moderators