You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
153 points

Really what it should be is that if a doctor prescribes unnecessary care, they should go after the doctor, not the patient. Doctors have malpractice insurance. If the health insurance can’t win a case of malpractice, then they should pay the bill. Why are patients in the midfle here at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

My attitude is that if the doctor prescribes unnecessary care there’s a professional board for that.

Though let’s be real, the health insurance for profit industry is the problem and it’s not going to get better until we get rid of it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, but the professional board is kinda like an HOA board. Should be more like a jury of all regular doctors or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

This is still validating the profit incentive of private health insurance.

If the doctor prescribes unnecessary care, it should be none of these peoples’ business, because they shouldn’t be allowed any stake in the decision whatsoever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

It’s the same trick as rebranding bank robberies to identity theft. It puts the blame on the consumer who can’t afford to defend themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Huh, I hadn’t thought of that as a Crying Indian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Patients usually have the least amount of power. That’s why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Really what it should be is that if a doctor prescribes unnecessary care

That’s the core problem. The entity that defines unnecessary care is health insurance. And there are TONS of stories of them denying Diabetes medication for people with diabetes and anti-nausea meds to pediatric patients getting chemo.

If they were doing the right thing, no one would be pissed off. The “recent target” was the one to decided to run on AI driven denials that were denying 90% of care for months.

They are not fulfilling their duty to take the money from the subscribers and pay their righteous medical bills and instead using it as raw profit.

They are employing their own ‘doctors’ to prove stuff that is definitely necessary is labeled unnecessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Reminds me of the Tobacco Instrustry setting up the “Tobacco Institute”, to disprove any links between smoking being addictive, and lung cancer.

They were constantly gaslighting the public, even tried to discredit the Surgeon General for his report on second hand smoke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not just meds. Patients with chronic pain are expected to take painkillers for treatment but omg if the doctor prescribes therapy deny that shit. Even though therapy helps faaaar better than medications for chronic pain sufferers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s the conflict of interest in the “decision maker”

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@lemmy.world

Create post

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 53K

    Comments