You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-13 points

.world is in the EU. The same laws that apply to inciting hate or violence against “The Jews” or “The Blacks” also apply to “The CEOs”. And the same laws that apply to Facebook also apply to lemmy.

permalink
report
reply
46 points

CEO is not an identity, nor minority. It’s a political and economical position

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

It should be unnecessary to point this out, but here we are

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

That’s not how the law works.

If anyone wants it a little more precise. Lemmy.world claims Dutch and German jurisdiction. An English translation of one relevant German statute may be found here (§130, but also note §131): https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1368

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah but i don’t care abt the law

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I was born into a poor family if genetic CEOs. We’ve lost our ancestral claims to the shareholders. We used to conduct layoffs from the Urals to the Black Sea. Not anymore.

We were a proud people, passing down strong CEO genes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sounds just like a Cuban expat pining over their lost family plantation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think it has much to do with ethics in the usual sense. It’s all about tribal allegiance. Facebook and the like are the enemy. Anything that seems to bother the enemy is cheered. There is no thought that laws apply generally. It reminds me of that old internet meme about conservatism. There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

I think you could make a serious argument that the CEO killing was self-defense. But it’s not going to really change anything. Maybe the successor is less ruthless but they will be making decisions in the same social context; facing the same incentives and disincentives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I can think of one disincentive in particular they probably wouldn’t have considered before a couple days ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Won’t someone think of the poor CEOs!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No. From the Case of Savva Terentyev v. Russia (police) of the European Court of Human Rights:

76.  The Court further considers that the police, a law-enforcement public agency, can hardly be described as an unprotected minority or group that has a history of oppression or inequality, or that faces deep-rooted prejudices, hostility and discrimination, or that is vulnerable for some other reason, and thus may, in principle, need a heightened protection from attacks committed by insult, holding up to ridicule or slander

ACAB, for pigs and CEOs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

Come and get 'em

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments