You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
284 points

Common and disgusting, but unfortunately not always a joke. You probably know this but for the benefit of others who may not be aware, the Husband Stitch is a real thing that used to be pretty commonly done regardless of what the woman wanted and often without her foreknowledge or consent. It’s an extra stitch or two placed when sewing a woman back up after a vaginal tear or episiotomy during labor. The purpose is to make the woman “tighter” so her husband can still enjoy having sex with her even though she’s given birth, which is staggeringly misogynistic and cruel. And it usually results in really painful sex for the woman because her vaginal opening is artificially small plus now it has inflexible scar tissue. It’s a horrific thing to do to a woman, especially after giving birth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points
*

still enjoy having sex with her

If you need that to enjoy your partner you don’t deserve them. That disgusting

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Thank you for providing additional information!

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Another thing to note is that the episiotomy itself is no longer a recommended procedure for routine births. The incision lengthens recovery time and brings complications of its own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Unfortunately, medical violence is a thing and many professionals, even when saying the episiotomy is a decision for the woman, put it in such a way that the message conveyed is that the episiotomy makes giving birth easier and quicker. What is witheld is that it makes it easier for them.

Giving birth was turned into a surgical event, when it is only a phisiological one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Speaking as someone who would have been stillborn if not for a C-section, there are some surgical procedures that are kind of important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Giving birth was turned into a surgical event, when it is only a phisiological one.

How can a woman give birth without the machine that goes PING?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I was under the impression it was forthe woman’s benefit, that it is easier for a cut to heal than a tear. Is that not the case? Is the risk of tearing overblown?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I think you actually have that backward. In general, a jagged tear heals quicker than an incision because there is more surface area in contact between the two pieces, so a larger number of cells can be working to repair the tissue. That said, I’m not a doctor and it’s been 10 years since my wife and I looked into this before our first kid, so I may be misremembering.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yep, a useful comment. I had no idea about such a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

… Jesus fucking Christ…

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

To add to your “for the benefit of others” explanation, this is also not a historical relic. It’s still happening.

I work with refugees and a lot of women escaping fundie warzones are living with variations of this nightmare. So much mutilation, as little girls, preteens, post-giving-birth… Infections are common, tearing is common, and sex is torture. I’ve been doing this job long enough that I recognize the walk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unholy fuckery! This makes me glad to live in country, where to get an operation you need to visit 9001 doctors and get 100500 approvals.

permalink
report
parent
reply